Active Users:761 Time:10/06/2026 12:28:39 AM
I'm not sure why it should be controversial. It was a great insight and one man's opinion. Tom Send a noteboard - 04/03/2010 09:26:19 PM
Most people do recognize that the war needed to be ended in this way to avoid the entire destruction of the Japanese race (whether in resistance or suicide). Iwo Jima, Okinawa, the kamikazes and other similar examples of the way Japanese soldiers and civilians were thinking prove that only something radical like the atomic bomb could avert even worse slaughter.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
This will be controversial in the extreme, I expect - - 04/03/2010 09:01:16 PM 381 Views
stories from the other side are always an interesting read - 04/03/2010 09:08:40 PM 166 Views
Fascinating is the word. - 04/03/2010 09:09:21 PM 190 Views
I liked it. - 04/03/2010 09:19:16 PM 163 Views
Re: Fascinating is the word. - 04/03/2010 09:53:26 PM 176 Views
An interesting tidbit - 04/03/2010 10:02:32 PM 175 Views
Makes sense; I've always heard invasion casualty estimates were 3 million dead. - 04/03/2010 10:40:11 PM 171 Views
That estimate sounds like what they told us. Not 100% on it though. *NM* - 04/03/2010 10:54:35 PM 55 Views
It seems like a fairly common number, FWIW. - 05/03/2010 01:16:35 AM 141 Views
Look at the casulities just from Okinawa and you can get an idea of what would have happened - 04/03/2010 11:43:00 PM 174 Views
Agreed. - 05/03/2010 01:14:13 AM 165 Views
Three days isn't exactly a long waiting period. - 05/03/2010 01:16:30 AM 153 Views
In war, three days is a lifetime. - 05/03/2010 01:18:49 AM 654 Views
Huh...I'd never heard that, but I'm not shocked - 04/03/2010 11:09:51 PM 162 Views
Very interesting. - 04/03/2010 09:16:42 PM 180 Views
Oh, not so sure about that - 04/03/2010 09:20:16 PM 181 Views
I'm not sure why it should be controversial. It was a great insight and one man's opinion. - 04/03/2010 09:26:19 PM 195 Views
Well - - 04/03/2010 10:04:29 PM 181 Views
An interesting read, didn't seem controversial *NM* - 04/03/2010 09:46:53 PM 51 Views

Reply to Message