Makes sense; I've always heard invasion casualty estimates were 3 million dead.
Joel Send a noteboard - 04/03/2010 10:40:11 PM
A million of ours, two million of theirs (and yes, I know that sounds backwards; I may be remembering it wrong, but the USN bombarded the coast every night for a year before the bombs, too. ) People today don't understand the mentality summed up in "death before dishonor" and few have heard the stories of hardened war veterans who knew they couldn't win but were dug into caves and cliff sides where they knew the death toll to finish them off would be staggering. VERY few people understand or even know about Japanese fascism driven by an Army Party as committed to nationalism and militarism as the worst German Nazi. Or remember the Bataan death march where not just soldiers but medical personnel were summarily executed if they couldn't keep moving. Germany had it's "War Guilt" conveniently blamed on Jews, but fascist Japan had as deep a sense of racial superiority born of a nation that hadn't lost a war in 2000 years. To see much, if not all, of this corroborated by a member of the IJN makes all the arguments that atomic bombs were inexcusable under any circumstances so much more hollow. And even at that, the United States has offered formal apologies and reparations to victims of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki blasts; no such measures are forthcoming nor expected for survivors of Bataan, Pearl or the Rape of Nanking, nor their families, and Korean girls forced into military prostitution at gunpoint remain persona non grata with the Japanese government.
War is hell, that one especially, and if the bomb spared millions suffering and death by ending it sooner, I'm OK with that; painting the US as villains because we insisted on unconditional surrender rather than a surrender that changed nothing and allowed those responsible for war to go unpunished doesn't change that. I can't say I'm sorry if this thread generates less controversy than you expected (but either way, you can't say I didn't do my part to help.
)
War is hell, that one especially, and if the bomb spared millions suffering and death by ending it sooner, I'm OK with that; painting the US as villains because we insisted on unconditional surrender rather than a surrender that changed nothing and allowed those responsible for war to go unpunished doesn't change that. I can't say I'm sorry if this thread generates less controversy than you expected (but either way, you can't say I didn't do my part to help.
)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 04/03/2010 at 10:41:32 PM
This will be controversial in the extreme, I expect -
- 04/03/2010 09:01:16 PM
381 Views
Fascinating is the word.
- 04/03/2010 09:09:21 PM
189 Views
Re: Fascinating is the word.
- 04/03/2010 09:53:26 PM
176 Views
An interesting tidbit
- 04/03/2010 10:02:32 PM
174 Views
Makes sense; I've always heard invasion casualty estimates were 3 million dead.
- 04/03/2010 10:40:11 PM
170 Views
That estimate sounds like what they told us. Not 100% on it though. *NM*
- 04/03/2010 10:54:35 PM
55 Views
Look at the casulities just from Okinawa and you can get an idea of what would have happened
- 04/03/2010 11:43:00 PM
174 Views
Agreed.
- 05/03/2010 01:14:13 AM
164 Views
I'm not sure why it should be controversial. It was a great insight and one man's opinion.
- 04/03/2010 09:26:19 PM
194 Views
