Active Users:346 Time:12/07/2025 06:17:07 AM
Re: why? mierin sedai - 30/09/2004 03:44:31 PM

It's been a while since I researched this, probably since it was first in the news, so I can't be specific at the moment. I'll try to go back and look it up soon. However, I remember strongly not agreeing with a handful of parts/requirements. My view on the environment tends to be a little different than most who would consider themselves environmentalists or "for the environment". I feel that many (not all) environmental issues should be addressed at a lower level than world leaders. If everyone, heck, if 50% of everyone took responsibility to be environmentally conscious of the small areas they affect (home, work, etc), I believe the environment would be better than it will be under any grandiose world plan.

Just my personal opinion.

but that does not work.
sure, you have to build awareness, but haliburton will not try to make their production more environment-friendly unless they are punished for releasing too much co2. god forbid it might cost them something.



Magnus Alexander corpore parvus erat
Dissenting voice of wotmania
Frightfully stubborn pacifist

Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent




View/create new replies Sign up for a premium account to add posts to a list of favourites!
A propos the russians ratifying kyoto... - 30/09/2004 08:38:48 AM 151 Views
We can hope.... - 30/09/2004 08:49:18 AM 19 Views
It bugs me that... - 30/09/2004 09:00:05 AM 21 Views
exactly how do we segué... - 30/09/2004 09:10:52 AM 36 Views
... - 30/09/2004 09:19:54 AM 34 Views
there is absolutely no correlation .... - 30/09/2004 09:28:52 AM 32 Views
Re: there is absolutely no correlation .... - 30/09/2004 09:52:08 AM 28 Views
you're comparing... - 30/09/2004 10:01:30 AM 24 Views
pedantic. - 30/09/2004 10:19:38 AM 25 Views
missing the point - 30/09/2004 10:29:27 AM 18 Views
Well,give us a link to the studies. - 30/09/2004 10:40:58 AM 14 Views
did it already - 30/09/2004 11:05:55 AM 11 Views
missing the point again - 30/09/2004 11:28:01 AM 10 Views
extreme weather in general - 30/09/2004 10:50:08 AM 20 Views
thank you *NM* - 30/09/2004 11:08:18 AM 4 Views
let me rephrase my question, though - 30/09/2004 12:07:44 PM 15 Views
Re: let me rephrase my question, though - 30/09/2004 12:43:06 PM 11 Views
whatever happened to - 30/09/2004 01:00:56 PM 8 Views
you weren't even wrong - 30/09/2004 11:32:11 AM 10 Views
you're being illogical - 30/09/2004 11:13:53 AM 10 Views
the logical flaw to your argument here.... - 30/09/2004 11:08:44 AM 18 Views
actually that was my point... - 30/09/2004 11:13:36 AM 15 Views
BUT - 30/09/2004 11:21:03 AM 14 Views
perhaps you should go back and reread the original post... - 30/09/2004 12:19:45 PM 15 Views
Again you are missing the point - 30/09/2004 08:36:08 PM 11 Views
this has become ridiculous... - 01/10/2004 09:25:50 AM 5 Views
well.... - 30/09/2004 10:59:49 AM 13 Views
my point was specific to Atlantic hurricanes.... - 30/09/2004 11:10:20 AM 8 Views
again though - 30/09/2004 11:16:50 AM 9 Views
The US will not ratify Kyoto with the next two decades - 30/09/2004 02:13:44 PM 23 Views
I know - 30/09/2004 02:30:13 PM 11 Views
I'm not sure I follow... - 30/09/2004 02:31:07 PM 16 Views
Re: I'm not sure I follow... - 30/09/2004 02:32:22 PM 12 Views
I hope not. *NM* - 30/09/2004 03:20:03 PM 5 Views
why? *NM* - 30/09/2004 03:21:27 PM 7 Views
Re: why? - 30/09/2004 03:39:44 PM 16 Views
Re: why? - 30/09/2004 03:44:31 PM 5 Views
Re: why? - 30/09/2004 04:07:16 PM 7 Views
well... - 30/09/2004 04:09:50 PM 7 Views
Re: It's easy to get a parliament to pass a treaty - 30/09/2004 04:13:18 PM 21 Views
Re: It's easy to get a parliament to pass a treaty - 30/09/2004 04:22:33 PM 16 Views
I heard yesterday... - 30/09/2004 04:32:35 PM 15 Views
That would be learning from their mistakes - 30/09/2004 06:26:34 PM 12 Views
*giggle* - 01/10/2004 03:23:09 AM 5 Views