Just imagine the fun you could have with two of those things together! Allow me to demonstrate:

That was 7 minutes after the midnight. As for dog Shears' before the lady; It had met to the middle grass of the lawn; House. That eye was closed. As for that when thinking, as been moving with the side, the methodological dog which moved pursuing the cat of the dream which was seen. But the dog is not continual or you did not sleep. The dog had died. There was a fork in the garden which is attached from the dog. The point of the fork is not different it meaning that the fork does not fall to the dog or the land entered completely. I the other reason, for example seem like the cancer, after dying because of traffic accident, attaching the fork in the garden to the dog me being not to be possible, to look at that the dog or my other every scar do not think whether the dog the fork decided that perhaps you are killed. But I am concerning this, it was not convinced.

The original text was this, the first paragraph of The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time, which was the closest suitable book I had to hand:

It was 7 minutes after midnight. The dog was lying on the grass in the middle of the lawn in front of Mrs Shears' house. Its eyes were closed. It looked as if it was running on its side, the way dogs run when they think they are chasing a cat in a dream. But the dog was not running or asleep. The dog was dead. There was a garden fork sticking out of the dog. The points of the fork must have gone all the way through the dog and into the ground because the fork had not fallen over. I decided that the dog was probably killed with the fork because I could not see any other wounds in the dog and I do not think you would stick a garden fork into a dog after it had died for some other reason, like cancer for example, or a road accident. But I could not be certain about this.

Yours, Tim .


You must chop down the tallest tree in the forest with... a herring!


l(a

le
af
fa
ll

s)
one
l

iness

Fadingoutandnowgone