Obviously it represents the post-modern deconstruction of the savant. Hodor provides an ironic commentary on the politically correct viewpoint of the "ersatz savant"--one who provides little to no benefit on a widespread societal level but cannot be discarded due to prevailing liberal tendencies.
BRILLIANT
BRILLIANT
Hodor is more than just a person, he's a way of life and world-view unto himself
That didn't sound like what I thought Ghavrel was saying. But then I had a heck of a time unraveling what he said. There are definitly some knots and tangles in that yarn still.
It all eventually flows back to Derrida, Foucault, and Lacan. And Hodor.
And most importantly, squirrels
An interesting bit from A Clash of Kings that sadly does not involve squirrels 
- 02/05/2010 06:21:37 AM
1008 Views
- 02/05/2010 06:21:37 AM
1008 Views
DUDE.
- 02/05/2010 06:27:53 AM
902 Views
For once we agree
- 02/05/2010 06:38:45 AM
821 Views
- 02/05/2010 06:38:45 AM
821 Views
~ Wanders away totally confused~
- 09/05/2010 03:19:45 AM
707 Views
The point was for you to become confused 
- 09/05/2010 04:05:17 AM
707 Views
- 09/05/2010 04:05:17 AM
707 Views
So it was all about me? I am used to that.
- 09/05/2010 04:36:40 AM
817 Views
*NM*
Derrida? I know I, as the author of that post, "am dead," but I was aiming more for Kierkegaard.
- 09/05/2010 08:26:32 AM
747 Views
*NM*