Active Users:345 Time:21/06/2024 07:29:07 AM
I think you misunderstand. Legolas Send a noteboard - 19/05/2010 12:28:42 AM
All science-fiction ends up being "set in the future of an alternative history" after enough time passes by, that's pretty much a given.

However, the alternative history as given in a sci-fi book tends to be relative to the time period the author wrote it in - by not having technology that is ubiquitous now, by continuing a belief or view that is considered outdated now, by involving the Soviet Union colonizing Mars, by depicting a United Nations that quickly turned into a world government as Clarke does in "Childhood's End", whatever. As such, the depiction of 2100 in the books of a writer of the 1950s can feel dated.

Now, you argued in your review that this was not the case, and Tom disagreed. I didn't see him saying anywhere that it "invalidated" the book for him, merely that for him personally, this particular indication of when the book was written made it seem very dated, whereas for you evidently it wasn't a big deal. It's not about "anomalies", either. It's about how the indications in this book about what time it was written in were not particularly obvious to you, so you said it hadn't aged, but were obvious to Tom and so he said it had.
Reply to message
A Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter M. Miller, Jr. - 18/05/2010 02:35:02 PM 5418 Views
Why was there a sequel? - 18/05/2010 09:38:57 PM 1420 Views
Miller had been working on it for a while and asked for assistance. - 18/05/2010 11:39:49 PM 1530 Views
It was an interesting book but it is very, very dated. - 18/05/2010 09:46:50 PM 1443 Views
I don't see how this invalidates the book. - 18/05/2010 11:57:24 PM 1352 Views
I think you misunderstand. - 19/05/2010 12:28:42 AM 1398 Views
I agree. - 19/05/2010 09:40:07 AM 1382 Views
I haven't read it yet - 19/05/2010 11:26:23 AM 1450 Views
We have a copy, should you wish to borrow it. *NM* - 19/05/2010 11:30:16 AM 707 Views
I might - 19/05/2010 11:55:04 AM 1363 Views
This is a very good book. - 19/05/2010 03:04:31 PM 1473 Views

Reply to Message