Active Users:686 Time:16/03/2026 09:26:18 PM
Oh, it's not about a lack of action. Legolas Send a noteboard - 28/05/2010 08:56:48 AM
Yeah, I thought so too. That happens when I write answers late in the evening :) I meant to chop it down to a few things the next morning, but I forgot and it post instead.

I see. ;)
That will probably depend how much he manages to draw my interest along the way. If he really hooks me, then I might very well enjoy his slower, not very eventful books (if I recall, one of those you speak of has been dubbed Erikson's CoT by some). As it happens, in complex series with tons of details and great worldbuilding, I'm usually the type who prefers the later books to the earliest books. To me, COT is one of the more enjoyable books in WOT, by far superior as I judge such things to anything published before LOC. And my favourite Dune was always Chapterhouse. My "road block" in WOT have always been EOTW and TGH, and with anything before Aragorn in LOTR, and so on. I'm not a reader who likes beginnings all that much!

I have to say I enjoyed CoT a lot more on my last reread, but one of the most enjoyable books in the series... no, sorry. :P

It doesn't really compare, though, because the problem is not that nothing happens in the later books. Every single Malazan book has the same pattern of relatively slow movement in the first half of the book (in some cases it's really slow, in others merely slow compared to the second half), and then the big "convergence" in the second half - he even has a plot justification for it, with the whole thing of Ascendants flocking to every convergence they see occurring in their vicinity and making the chaos bigger.

It's more that you just don't care as much anymore, because it doesn't seem like the series is really going anywhere - new characters keep coming, old characters keep dying, and no later book comes close to the levels of MoI. Sure, you keep having to figure out things, and you keep learning more details about earlier books (if you want to know more about that dragon Silanah in Gardens of the Moon, you'll see her in book eight, for instance), but I don't know, personally I kind of want there to be a point to things, and to have the series end in some satisfactory way that provides at least some kind of closure for at least most plot threads. I still have to read the final two books, but it doesn't look to me like that's going to happen.

I would probably have to reread books six, seven and eight before making this kind of judgements, but if you asked me now, I'd have to say both Reaper's Gale and Toll the Hounds were among my least favourite books in the series - despite being among the most spectacular in terms of plot events. Toll the Hounds has a truly massive, game-changing thing happening in its climax, but I still didn't like the book much. Bonehunters was more fun, but felt somewhat fluffy in the sense that little of it seemed to matter all that much in the greater scheme of things.
And speaking of road blocks, I've beat my record and finished GOTM in under two weeks for the first time (past record was maybe 2 months). Now I'm 300 pages into DHG a day later and having fun. Hopefully, I will get to those books 7-8 through the summer.

Good job! :P
Reply to message
Steven Erikson and Ian Cameron Esslemont, Malazan Book of the Fallen (series reviews) - 17/05/2010 01:09:47 PM 1508 Views
Gardens of the Moon (2002-2005 re-reads; 2010 re-read) - 17/05/2010 01:10:14 PM 1122 Views
I have the same experience with rereads of Erikson always bringing new things to the fore. - 17/05/2010 01:32:28 PM 981 Views
Legolas - 17/05/2010 07:17:38 PM 958 Views
I wonder as well - 18/05/2010 07:12:23 PM 986 Views
Re: I have the same experience with rereads of Erikson always bringing new things to the fore. - 19/05/2010 02:12:42 PM 877 Views
MT was just as good as those two, IMHO of course. - 21/05/2010 12:29:22 PM 814 Views
Re: MT was just as good as those two, IMHO of course. - 21/05/2010 03:39:10 PM 932 Views
Agreed. - 21/05/2010 03:43:56 PM 939 Views
That’s one of the things I like about MT more than DG - 22/05/2010 11:57:32 AM 850 Views
Larry - 17/05/2010 07:19:16 PM 944 Views
You're welcome *NM* - 18/05/2010 07:12:46 PM 381 Views
For me, GotM remains a half-failure - 22/05/2010 06:05:30 PM 1131 Views
I think even most fans of the series will agree with you there. - 22/05/2010 07:32:25 PM 937 Views
Re: I think even most fans of the series will agree with you there. - 23/05/2010 10:32:49 PM 1044 Views
Ye gods, that reply was long. - 27/05/2010 04:20:35 PM 886 Views
Re: Ye gods, that reply was long. - 27/05/2010 10:57:00 PM 989 Views
Oh, it's not about a lack of action. - 28/05/2010 08:56:48 AM 1005 Views
Re: Oh, it's not about a lack of action. - 28/05/2010 02:11:01 PM 922 Views
I'm waiting for the paperback. - 28/05/2010 08:44:47 PM 887 Views
Re: Oh, it's not about a lack of action. - 28/05/2010 10:51:10 PM 1035 Views
It's not my cup of tea. Good luck reading it! - 19/05/2010 03:42:08 PM 1092 Views
I've got to ask. - 20/05/2010 08:56:14 PM 909 Views
Fans of the series told me that "Gardens of the Moon" isn't a good book to start with. - 21/05/2010 10:47:52 PM 1044 Views
I agree with Kotagg - 21/05/2010 01:52:06 PM 886 Views
I thought it was very standard fare. - 21/05/2010 10:49:41 PM 1041 Views
Deadhouse Gates (2002-2005 reads; 2010 re-read) - 21/05/2010 06:13:47 PM 985 Views
You left out the most important part! - 21/05/2010 06:45:58 PM 1038 Views
Some things I leave until latter novels - 21/05/2010 06:54:36 PM 1019 Views
I find myself... - 06/06/2010 03:21:07 AM 1068 Views
From what I recall, yes - 06/06/2010 04:56:42 AM 915 Views
It makes sense. Thanks - 14/06/2010 11:57:08 PM 1076 Views
Memories of Ice (2002-2005 reads; 2010 re-read) - 27/05/2010 08:47:02 AM 997 Views
As I posted in your blog RE: Themes. - 27/05/2010 05:25:19 PM 1027 Views
House of Chains (2002-2005 reads; 2010 re-read) - 01/06/2010 06:17:01 AM 1038 Views

Reply to Message