They can be now because of a change in set up of the House of Lords in 1999 or so. So 92 members of the Lords are hereditary, and the others can then be in the House of Commons, if they are duly elected.
Makes sense - kind of like how the former king of Bulgaria managed to get himself elected PM sixty years down the line (only less spectacular, I suppose
). See link - the Marquess of Hartington, future Duke of Devonshire, was Secretary for War at that point, but held his seat in the Commons until he became Duke. And Lord Randolph Churchill (Winston's father) is just styled "Lord" as you can see - according to Wikipedia, he was the third son of the Duke of Marlborough, hence never got a peerage or seat in the Lords, not even a courtesy title, but he still got to call himself Lord.
This message last edited by Legolas on 02/06/2010 at 11:46:56 PM
/Other Literature: Drood by Dan Simmons
- 02/06/2010 10:47:13 PM
17178 Views
I'm about 200 pages in and I've found the first thing that really annoys me:
- 02/06/2010 11:15:33 PM
2183 Views
Re: I'm about 200 pages in and I've found the first thing that really annoys me:
- 02/06/2010 11:18:23 PM
2300 Views
There are (okay, were, I'm temporarily living in the 1890s...) MPs who are styled Lord, though.
- 02/06/2010 11:22:33 PM
2064 Views
Link me, please?
- 02/06/2010 11:31:01 PM
2063 Views
Sure.
- 02/06/2010 11:46:32 PM
2453 Views
Nice review. I have a possibly difficult question...
- 02/06/2010 11:18:56 PM
2019 Views
- 02/06/2010 11:18:56 PM
2019 Views
Re: Nice review. I have a possibly difficult question...
- 06/06/2010 01:43:42 AM
2116 Views
- 06/06/2010 01:43:42 AM
2116 Views
That Italian book
- 06/06/2010 09:24:47 AM
1921 Views
damning review had it on my wishlist...i'll be taking it off
- 03/06/2010 05:29:42 PM
2037 Views
Re: damning review had it on my wishlist...i'll be taking it off
- 03/06/2010 05:36:06 PM
2101 Views
Have now finished it.
- 04/06/2010 04:30:48 PM
2028 Views
*spoiler*
- 04/06/2010 04:32:19 PM
2121 Views
Well, within the bounds of the story there's really nothing slanderous in that.
- 04/06/2010 04:43:34 PM
2027 Views
Re: Well, within the bounds of the story there's really nothing slanderous in that.
- 04/06/2010 04:56:35 PM
2020 Views
