They can be now because of a change in set up of the House of Lords in 1999 or so. So 92 members of the Lords are hereditary, and the others can then be in the House of Commons, if they are duly elected.
Makes sense - kind of like how the former king of Bulgaria managed to get himself elected PM sixty years down the line (only less spectacular, I suppose
). See link - the Marquess of Hartington, future Duke of Devonshire, was Secretary for War at that point, but held his seat in the Commons until he became Duke. And Lord Randolph Churchill (Winston's father) is just styled "Lord" as you can see - according to Wikipedia, he was the third son of the Duke of Marlborough, hence never got a peerage or seat in the Lords, not even a courtesy title, but he still got to call himself Lord.
This message last edited by Legolas on 02/06/2010 at 11:46:56 PM
/Other Literature: Drood by Dan Simmons
- 02/06/2010 10:47:13 PM
17358 Views
I'm about 200 pages in and I've found the first thing that really annoys me:
- 02/06/2010 11:15:33 PM
2238 Views
Re: I'm about 200 pages in and I've found the first thing that really annoys me:
- 02/06/2010 11:18:23 PM
2361 Views
There are (okay, were, I'm temporarily living in the 1890s...) MPs who are styled Lord, though.
- 02/06/2010 11:22:33 PM
2122 Views
Link me, please?
- 02/06/2010 11:31:01 PM
2126 Views
Sure.
- 02/06/2010 11:46:32 PM
2508 Views
Nice review. I have a possibly difficult question...
- 02/06/2010 11:18:56 PM
2083 Views
- 02/06/2010 11:18:56 PM
2083 Views
Re: Nice review. I have a possibly difficult question...
- 06/06/2010 01:43:42 AM
2208 Views
- 06/06/2010 01:43:42 AM
2208 Views
That Italian book
- 06/06/2010 09:24:47 AM
1993 Views
damning review had it on my wishlist...i'll be taking it off
- 03/06/2010 05:29:42 PM
2091 Views
Re: damning review had it on my wishlist...i'll be taking it off
- 03/06/2010 05:36:06 PM
2166 Views
Have now finished it.
- 04/06/2010 04:30:48 PM
2084 Views
*spoiler*
- 04/06/2010 04:32:19 PM
2175 Views
Well, within the bounds of the story there's really nothing slanderous in that.
- 04/06/2010 04:43:34 PM
2088 Views
Re: Well, within the bounds of the story there's really nothing slanderous in that.
- 04/06/2010 04:56:35 PM
2096 Views
