You and I had two exchanges in that thread, you know.
The Shrike Send a noteboard - 03/06/2010 01:55:02 PM
My main bone of contention in that post was with nossy, Rebekah, and even later Jacob, though his mis-characterization. I was happy with my original reply about watching Big Brother back.
But you and I only replied twice to each other in that post. Whatever you are remembering is not an accurate reflection of reality.
Whatever else, I still respect and like you. Be well.
But you and I only replied twice to each other in that post. Whatever you are remembering is not an accurate reflection of reality.
Whatever else, I still respect and like you. Be well.
Reminder: The Gone-Away World discussion begins on Monday, June 7.
30/05/2010 07:23:17 PM
- 494 Views
I wonder if I can "Dumas" this
31/05/2010 05:34:32 AM
- 401 Views
You are welcome to be critical of the novel and the author, and to ask probing questions of opinions
01/06/2010 02:20:40 PM
- 386 Views
There are different ways of doing that, though
01/06/2010 03:59:31 PM
- 311 Views
I am pleased by these Dumas references in this thread. *NM*
01/06/2010 04:08:05 PM
- 154 Views
why? *NM*
01/06/2010 04:09:32 PM
- 135 Views
It shows that the discussion was memorable/notorious. And that pleases me.
01/06/2010 04:11:33 PM
- 338 Views
but it was not memorable in any good way
01/06/2010 04:16:12 PM
- 309 Views
It was memorable for me in both positive and negative respects.
01/06/2010 04:50:24 PM
- 375 Views
Re: It was memorable for me in both positive and negative respects.
01/06/2010 04:51:20 PM
- 337 Views
Isn't that being a bit petty, though?
02/06/2010 05:04:03 AM
- 407 Views
Not petty. It is not entirely a conscious choice.
02/06/2010 09:26:58 AM
- 416 Views
You and I had two exchanges in that thread, you know.
03/06/2010 01:55:02 PM
- 437 Views
Which is the reason why I commented like I did. *NM*
01/06/2010 04:31:13 PM
- 140 Views
It's been a few months, but I plan to say a couple of things *NM*
03/06/2010 11:45:04 AM
- 148 Views