If you don't find anything intriguing in the first book, you shouldn't take a flier on the second and then possibly the third on anyone's opinion.
Am I missing something about the Dresden Files?
- 22/06/2010 04:05:52 PM
662 Views
I haven't read them, but I understand they're not that deep, but fun, and get better as they go on. *NM*
- 22/06/2010 04:23:20 PM
157 Views
I'm not really feeling the "fun" just yet. I'll finish this book, though. *NM*
- 22/06/2010 05:19:40 PM
207 Views
To be honest, the first two books are a bit formulaic
- 22/06/2010 04:27:01 PM
467 Views
First three, for me
- 22/06/2010 04:59:49 PM
442 Views
My time is valuable. I'm not giving an author three books of my time just to see if I like him. *NM*
- 22/06/2010 05:16:34 PM
191 Views
They're short books!
*NM*
- 22/06/2010 05:20:43 PM
171 Views
*NM*
- 22/06/2010 05:20:43 PM
171 Views
That's true. I got through the first couple shortly. And, note, they're not BAD, they're just a bit
- 23/06/2010 08:40:29 PM
387 Views
The first book really isn't a good example of the series.
- 22/06/2010 04:27:45 PM
440 Views
I think the only way I would continue is if those "hints" are promising enough for me.
- 22/06/2010 05:19:06 PM
449 Views
Which is the way that it should be.
- 22/06/2010 07:22:42 PM
392 Views
Not really
- 22/06/2010 05:52:22 PM
444 Views
I may abandon the read altogether and just read something else.
- 22/06/2010 06:24:36 PM
462 Views
They grow up.
- 22/06/2010 10:05:37 PM
422 Views
Yeah...uh...I'm probably going to finish this book.
- 23/06/2010 01:50:19 AM
425 Views
Good idea.
- 23/06/2010 04:29:23 PM
389 Views
Let me clarify: the book may be finished at some point in some year.
- 23/06/2010 09:53:43 PM
415 Views

