Active Users:214 Time:08/05/2024 03:31:41 PM
Re: Hmm Camilla Send a noteboard - 28/09/2010 04:41:16 PM
I've never read any of it, but I will say this:

conflating homosexuality and bisexuality with incest is problematic.

I don't think I was lumping them together in any way, though. It's only problematic if you're an a-hole. (Man, we have a different vocab. I think this is the first time I saw the word "conflate" ).


How is it only problematic if you are an a-hole?

Also, once you get to shared great-grandfathers most people will not think twice. I think.

The quote makes it plain that most supernatural beings are more lenient towards incest than those who aren't supernatural. That's odd, because there's no explanation why it should be so.


Hmm. Perhaps they cannot breed? I have no idea how things work in that world.

And I am a prude. Really.

And I'm fine with that.

The rest I cannot really comment on, having neither read the books nor seen the series (I assume this is the foundation for the True Blood series?).

Yeah, it is.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
Sookie Stackhouse novels. The gay people bother me, what's up with them? - 27/09/2010 07:37:32 PM 970 Views
Recommendation: never read the Anita Blake novels. - 27/09/2010 10:27:27 PM 831 Views
Hmm - 27/09/2010 10:58:01 PM 687 Views
Re: Hmm - 28/09/2010 04:32:18 PM 716 Views
Re: Hmm - 28/09/2010 04:41:16 PM 575 Views
Re: Hmm - 28/09/2010 05:27:58 PM 606 Views
Re: Hmm - 28/09/2010 05:31:48 PM 644 Views
totally made up answer - 28/09/2010 09:56:07 PM 587 Views
what part of Arkansas did you say you were from? - 28/09/2010 09:48:15 PM 541 Views

Reply to Message