Active Users:2129 Time:08/05/2026 06:35:08 AM
Re: Pet peeve, sorry. Legolas Send a noteboard - 29/09/2010 11:50:36 PM
I remember "shew", I think. Now you mention it.

There are others that are even more fun, but those don't occur as often. I think one of the typos I was thinking of was "neice" for "niece", that occurred a few times iirc. Shew and surprize obviously aren't typos, just antiquated spelling.
And while we're at the language: what's with the paraphrases between quotes? That's just weird. Either it's a quote, or it's a paraphrase.

The whowhatwhere? Do you have an example?

For instance, at one point Emma sends Jane a note to say she'll come by and pick her up with her carriage. She gets a note in return which is quoted (as in, put between quotes) as being "Miss Fairfax' compliments and thanks, but is quite unequal to any exercise". Now obviously that wouldn't have been what Jane wrote, she'd have written "My compliments and thanks, but I'm quite unequal to any exercise". Hence, paraphrases presented as quotes. It's odd.

Or further on the same page, Miss Bates is quoted as saying "Indeed, the truth was, that poor dear Jane could not bear to see anybody". Again, obviously, the literal quote would have to be different (is instead of was and can instead of could, at the very least).

There's tons of those, so evidently it was the custom at the time, but I find it weird.
Hmm, well, it's been a while since I read it, too.

I see I have to stop talking about this or you'll just reread the full 1300 pages worth of Austen novels.
It's not a confirmed pattern, but a tendency. Well, "child-bride" may be giving the wrong impression. They are not actually children when they get married. But they are sometimes groomed from an early age and marry young.

I find it interesting how "old" the women in Austen marry, now that you mention it. That is, there are some who do marry quite young (Lydia Bennet, for one), but the heroines are generally over twenty. In the books I've read, that is. I suppose lower class girls would marry earlier, though, and Dickens does of course write a lot more about lower class people.
They are good. Northanger Abbey is different from the "typical" Austen, though. More ironic. You might want to read some Radcliffe or some such before you read it, if you haven't already.

I haven't, no. I think I'll just read it anyway and see what I think of it.
This message last edited by Legolas on 29/09/2010 at 11:51:14 PM
Reply to message
Jane Austen - Emma - 29/09/2010 06:37:01 PM 929 Views
And a mini-review of the mini-novel Lady Susan - 29/09/2010 06:49:33 PM 673 Views
Re: And a mini-review of the mini-novel Lady Susan - 29/09/2010 08:21:22 PM 699 Views
It has been a while since I have read the book, but I am not sure I agree on all counts. - 29/09/2010 08:17:35 PM 830 Views
All the better, it's so boring when everyone agrees. - 29/09/2010 09:01:09 PM 826 Views
Re: All the better, it's so boring when everyone agrees. - 29/09/2010 09:39:25 PM 784 Views
Okay, fair enough, I'm talking about her view as appears in her books, there might be a difference. - 29/09/2010 09:48:31 PM 740 Views
Pet peeve, sorry. - 29/09/2010 10:19:03 PM 791 Views
Re: Pet peeve, sorry. - 29/09/2010 11:24:21 PM 767 Views
Re: Pet peeve, sorry. - 29/09/2010 11:32:50 PM 717 Views
Re: Pet peeve, sorry. - 29/09/2010 11:50:36 PM 693 Views
Re: Pet peeve, sorry. - 30/09/2010 12:03:54 AM 767 Views
Are you going to read Persuasion next? - 29/09/2010 09:30:27 PM 691 Views
Likely either that or Northanger Abbey, yeah. *NM* - 29/09/2010 09:39:30 PM 308 Views
Having re-read it now... - 07/12/2010 12:06:53 AM 743 Views

Reply to Message