Active Users:170 Time:18/05/2024 11:02:10 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I didn't check, but it was around the same size as the regular edition so I am assuming its the same *NM* Stephen Send a noteboard - 16/01/2011 08:22:36 PM
You sure it was the original, not a book version of the movie? :(
"I mean, if everyone had a soul, there would be no contrast by which we could appreciate it. For giving us this perspective, we thank you." - Nate
Reply to message
Bantam rejacketing ASoIaF in the USA. Again. Werthead - 16/01/2011 06:52:28 PM 928 Views
God, how dumb! Another reason not to like Martin anymore. *NM* everynametaken - 16/01/2011 07:04:01 PM 317 Views
You can't really blame Martin for this Stephen - 16/01/2011 07:14:13 PM 579 Views
As an aside to this cover discussion Stephen - 16/01/2011 07:16:19 PM 671 Views
Dear God. ironclad - 16/01/2011 07:19:08 PM 603 Views
I didn't check, but it was around the same size as the regular edition so I am assuming its the same *NM* Stephen - 16/01/2011 08:22:36 PM 212 Views
I hate when book covers note the existence of a movie or tv show. Nate - 16/01/2011 09:15:33 PM 589 Views
Seconded. *NM* Bergioyn - 18/01/2011 04:01:56 PM 349 Views
That's an ugly cover. *NM* ? - 17/01/2011 12:43:44 AM 248 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes