Secondly, there are some negative aspects of the novel, but it has little to do with perceived flaws in the reviewing approach. I guess I could link to a series of reviews of reviews that I've done in the past, but what's the point, no?
It'd feed your ego, of course.
The Magicians by Lev Grossman
- 14/09/2009 07:50:28 AM
689 Views
USA Today LAMBASTED this novel. *NM*
- 15/09/2009 07:42:28 PM
203 Views
That was a rather poor review of the book
- 15/09/2009 09:59:27 PM
415 Views
It's a newspaper review... it's supposed to summarize and maybe analyze a little.
- 17/09/2009 02:07:37 AM
412 Views
It's still a poorly done review, even for a newspaper review.
- 17/09/2009 04:28:15 PM
402 Views
Hmmm, seems strange to me that you both would independently come to that conclusion.
- 17/09/2009 08:10:11 PM
442 Views
Why is it strange?
- 17/09/2009 10:26:32 PM
390 Views
What's the point?
- 18/09/2009 04:41:38 AM
461 Views
I know the difference
- 17/09/2009 05:55:46 PM
473 Views
You should apply at USA Today. Show 'em a thing or two!
- 17/09/2009 08:08:39 PM
466 Views
Why not Publishers Weekly?
- 17/09/2009 10:24:57 PM
371 Views
Well, I have a big penis.
- 18/09/2009 04:42:41 AM
396 Views
Junk Comparing Competition. I can see I have accomplished everything I wanted with this review 
- 18/09/2009 06:05:41 AM
376 Views
- 18/09/2009 06:05:41 AM
376 Views
That's basically what it comes down to whenever anyone disagrees with Larry.
- 20/09/2009 12:39:32 AM
419 Views
Well, I didn't like The Grapes of Wrath or The Old Man and the Sea...
- 23/09/2009 05:37:14 PM
498 Views