Secondly, there are some negative aspects of the novel, but it has little to do with perceived flaws in the reviewing approach. I guess I could link to a series of reviews of reviews that I've done in the past, but what's the point, no?
It'd feed your ego, of course.
The Magicians by Lev Grossman
14/09/2009 07:50:28 AM
- 571 Views
USA Today LAMBASTED this novel. *NM*
15/09/2009 07:42:28 PM
- 160 Views
That was a rather poor review of the book
15/09/2009 09:59:27 PM
- 304 Views
It's a newspaper review... it's supposed to summarize and maybe analyze a little.
17/09/2009 02:07:37 AM
- 299 Views
It's still a poorly done review, even for a newspaper review.
17/09/2009 04:28:15 PM
- 294 Views
Hmmm, seems strange to me that you both would independently come to that conclusion.
17/09/2009 08:10:11 PM
- 334 Views
Why is it strange?
17/09/2009 10:26:32 PM
- 285 Views
What's the point?
18/09/2009 04:41:38 AM
- 359 Views
I know the difference
17/09/2009 05:55:46 PM
- 371 Views
You should apply at USA Today. Show 'em a thing or two!
17/09/2009 08:08:39 PM
- 364 Views
Why not Publishers Weekly?
17/09/2009 10:24:57 PM
- 273 Views
Well, I have a big penis.
18/09/2009 04:42:41 AM
- 283 Views
Junk Comparing Competition. I can see I have accomplished everything I wanted with this review
18/09/2009 06:05:41 AM
- 276 Views
That's basically what it comes down to whenever anyone disagrees with Larry.
20/09/2009 12:39:32 AM
- 316 Views
Well, I didn't like The Grapes of Wrath or The Old Man and the Sea...
23/09/2009 05:37:14 PM
- 393 Views