Active Users:1623 Time:25/12/2025 03:38:38 PM
This is a thought out, finely articulated response. beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 05/06/2011 06:47:13 PM
...it's also kind of crap.

People aren't suddenly obsessed with vampires because of the downward spiral of society and the death of God. They're obsessed with vampires because that's just what the current trend is. In the 80s, it was robots.


Maybe I'm being a bit too hard on you by saying it's crap. It's definitely a valid interpretation. It just reads like someone in a college lit class trying too hard to find meaning.

About a decade ago, yo-yos briefly became popular again (after falling out of style, becoming popular, falling out of style, becoming popular...). Was this indicative of our national character, that we longed for the idyllic days of yesteryear, for a historical Americana that never actually existed?


Vampires are neat because you can do a lot with them, they're standardized enough to make people comfortable, but customizable enough that you can tweak them for whatever themes you want (gothic horror, comedies, power fantasies, romances). There's the "bad boy" element, which is always intriguing.



It's just a fad. Don't get too flustered by it.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
This WSJ article has kicked up a huge fuss on the internet - YA is "too dark". - 05/06/2011 03:46:50 PM 2112 Views
There's only one thing about this literature that disturbs me - 05/06/2011 05:39:35 PM 1097 Views
This is a thought out, finely articulated response. - 05/06/2011 06:47:13 PM 1095 Views
If it were just vampires that would be just fine - 05/06/2011 08:03:02 PM 875 Views
People have been complaining about this since the novel was invented - 05/06/2011 11:02:58 PM 943 Views
This is different. - 06/06/2011 01:56:56 AM 950 Views
Apparently the article did paint far too bleak a picture, - 06/06/2011 12:39:46 PM 1035 Views
Why waste time with "YA literature" at all? - 06/06/2011 02:14:03 PM 812 Views
Re: Why waste time with "YA literature" at all? - 06/06/2011 02:28:42 PM 767 Views
I think that's a post factum justification, not a reason. - 06/06/2011 05:08:09 PM 968 Views
Maybe. It's hard to separate, I think. - 07/06/2011 01:06:29 PM 999 Views
Very good post. - 06/06/2011 08:52:22 PM 850 Views
You seem to be the only one who thinks so. *NM* - 07/06/2011 01:17:18 AM 303 Views
I don't think it's a bad post... I just think that the "despair" is a teen fad, and not as bad as - 07/06/2011 03:19:03 AM 1094 Views
Suicide rates have gone up significantly - 07/06/2011 02:42:55 PM 761 Views
Heh. - 08/06/2011 07:24:44 PM 1069 Views
you are having trouble finding cultural ideas that turned bad? - 08/06/2011 11:56:23 PM 993 Views
The classic problem of the overprotective parent- underestimating your kids - 09/06/2011 05:33:54 AM 937 Views
The Diary of Anne Frank? Seriously? - 10/06/2011 08:13:47 PM 913 Views
I'm sure the percentage of good books must be higher than they make it sound, - 05/06/2011 05:53:21 PM 1129 Views
I'd say books offer a fundamentally different experience than movies - 05/06/2011 06:53:55 PM 1089 Views
I'm not sure that makes a difference here. - 06/06/2011 04:47:05 AM 1066 Views
Because thinking makes you LESS susceptible to these things you're afraid of - 06/06/2011 05:27:26 PM 1093 Views
I don't completely agree with that. - 06/06/2011 07:26:21 PM 1054 Views
I feel like I just can't relate to parents determined to shelter their kids from everything - 06/06/2011 10:21:44 PM 1026 Views
I don't think that is what this is. - 06/06/2011 10:41:06 PM 925 Views
I suppose I'm giving a lot of credit to the status of "reader" - 07/06/2011 03:08:48 AM 916 Views
Your response is about where I sit. - 06/06/2011 12:30:04 PM 926 Views
Nope, this is stupid - 05/06/2011 06:38:51 PM 917 Views
Parents have the right and resonsibility to know what their children are reading - 06/06/2011 03:41:22 AM 838 Views
Re: Parents have the right and resonsibility to know what their children are reading - 06/06/2011 12:40:24 PM 974 Views
I'd argue if you're old enough to be interested in the subject matter, you're old enough to read it - 06/06/2011 05:32:33 PM 1100 Views
well so far you have failed to make the argument - 07/06/2011 04:22:00 AM 1029 Views
Depends on the subject matter. - 07/06/2011 01:07:57 PM 849 Views
Basically? Yes. - 07/06/2011 06:42:04 PM 1094 Views
why do think there is value in letting them read whatever they want? - 07/06/2011 06:52:20 PM 767 Views
Don't be an idiot. - 09/06/2011 05:25:26 AM 954 Views
I am being an idiot? - 09/06/2011 04:10:28 PM 937 Views
I wasn't calling you an idiot for disagreeing with me. - 09/06/2011 04:44:37 PM 997 Views
Do we restrict access or alter parenting? - 06/06/2011 04:31:13 AM 1161 Views
Well, I wrote a long piece related to this - 06/06/2011 05:21:06 AM 1050 Views
She kind of conflates some issues that are quite different, if you ask me. - 06/06/2011 08:47:33 PM 986 Views
A+++ would read this reply again *NM* - 06/06/2011 10:23:11 PM 316 Views
+1 *NM* - 07/06/2011 01:12:16 AM 305 Views
Wait wait wait wait wait... NYT reviewed Game of Thrones? I must read this - 07/06/2011 03:20:08 AM 852 Views
I think he's talking about the review of the tv show they did. - 07/06/2011 03:30:19 AM 789 Views
Indeed. Everything she said. *NM* - 07/06/2011 06:13:20 PM 283 Views
it does take a lot of work to keep track of your kids - 07/06/2011 05:02:55 AM 1007 Views
*I agree with this* *NM* - 07/06/2011 01:18:58 PM 374 Views

Reply to Message