I'd argue if you're old enough to be interested in the subject matter, you're old enough to read it
beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 06/06/2011 05:32:33 PM
This doesn't translate into other subjects- just because you're old enough to be interested in driving or drinking or running for President, doesn't mean you should be allowed to do them.
But reading is a fundamentally mental exercise- by reading about something, you're immediately seeing things from new perspectives, analyzing them from different angles, and the like.
It's all very well and good to want to protect your children, but going "No, you can't read that," is the worst way to do it. Anyone who's interested in book series about, say, a teen runaway, is almost by definition at least partially interested in reading about the topic of being a teen runaway. Forbidding access to information to someone who is old enough to be interested in the information is just a losing battle- they'll get to it in any case.
But reading is a fundamentally mental exercise- by reading about something, you're immediately seeing things from new perspectives, analyzing them from different angles, and the like.
It's all very well and good to want to protect your children, but going "No, you can't read that," is the worst way to do it. Anyone who's interested in book series about, say, a teen runaway, is almost by definition at least partially interested in reading about the topic of being a teen runaway. Forbidding access to information to someone who is old enough to be interested in the information is just a losing battle- they'll get to it in any case.
I amuse myself.
This WSJ article has kicked up a huge fuss on the internet - YA is "too dark".
05/06/2011 03:46:50 PM
- 2049 Views
There's only one thing about this literature that disturbs me
05/06/2011 05:39:35 PM
- 1003 Views
This is a thought out, finely articulated response.
05/06/2011 06:47:13 PM
- 1041 Views
If it were just vampires that would be just fine
05/06/2011 08:03:02 PM
- 822 Views
People have been complaining about this since the novel was invented
05/06/2011 11:02:58 PM
- 894 Views
Apparently the article did paint far too bleak a picture,
06/06/2011 12:39:46 PM
- 981 Views
Why waste time with "YA literature" at all?
06/06/2011 02:14:03 PM
- 759 Views
Re: Why waste time with "YA literature" at all?
06/06/2011 02:28:42 PM
- 717 Views
I think that's a post factum justification, not a reason.
06/06/2011 05:08:09 PM
- 907 Views
Maybe. It's hard to separate, I think.
07/06/2011 01:06:29 PM
- 947 Views
One certainly has to choose the real literature to present, certainly.
07/06/2011 02:27:00 PM
- 967 Views
Very good post.
06/06/2011 08:52:22 PM
- 779 Views
You seem to be the only one who thinks so.
*NM*
07/06/2011 01:17:18 AM
- 277 Views

I don't think it's a bad post... I just think that the "despair" is a teen fad, and not as bad as
07/06/2011 03:19:03 AM
- 1039 Views
Suicide rates have gone up significantly
07/06/2011 02:42:55 PM
- 715 Views
Heh.
08/06/2011 07:24:44 PM
- 1019 Views
you are having trouble finding cultural ideas that turned bad?
08/06/2011 11:56:23 PM
- 936 Views
The classic problem of the overprotective parent- underestimating your kids
09/06/2011 05:33:54 AM
- 875 Views
the classic problem of people who have no idea what they are talking about
09/06/2011 04:16:25 PM
- 825 Views
Are you really equating reading about trauma with trauma? They are not the same. *NM*
09/06/2011 07:10:34 PM
- 291 Views
I'm sure the percentage of good books must be higher than they make it sound,
05/06/2011 05:53:21 PM
- 1072 Views
I'd say books offer a fundamentally different experience than movies
05/06/2011 06:53:55 PM
- 995 Views
I'm not sure that makes a difference here.
06/06/2011 04:47:05 AM
- 998 Views
Because thinking makes you LESS susceptible to these things you're afraid of
06/06/2011 05:27:26 PM
- 1028 Views
I don't completely agree with that.
06/06/2011 07:26:21 PM
- 982 Views
I feel like I just can't relate to parents determined to shelter their kids from everything
06/06/2011 10:21:44 PM
- 974 Views
To think the content described is acceptable, when they ban "Huck Finn" for using 'nigger'.
*NM*
05/06/2011 09:45:15 PM
- 308 Views

CNN: "On a website, a person named 'Macharius' used the 'N-word'".
06/06/2011 01:58:35 AM
- 761 Views
Parents have the right and resonsibility to know what their children are reading
06/06/2011 03:41:22 AM
- 789 Views
Re: Parents have the right and resonsibility to know what their children are reading
06/06/2011 12:40:24 PM
- 924 Views
I'd argue if you're old enough to be interested in the subject matter, you're old enough to read it
06/06/2011 05:32:33 PM
- 1053 Views
Depends on the subject matter.
07/06/2011 01:07:57 PM
- 802 Views
Basically? Yes.
07/06/2011 06:42:04 PM
- 1046 Views
why do think there is value in letting them read whatever they want?
07/06/2011 06:52:20 PM
- 716 Views
Don't be an idiot.
09/06/2011 05:25:26 AM
- 901 Views
Well, I wrote a long piece related to this
06/06/2011 05:21:06 AM
- 988 Views
Great post. She really tries to muddy the waters relating to censorship and parenting.
06/06/2011 08:05:21 AM
- 870 Views
She kind of conflates some issues that are quite different, if you ask me.
06/06/2011 08:47:33 PM
- 924 Views
Wait wait wait wait wait... NYT reviewed Game of Thrones? I must read this
07/06/2011 03:20:08 AM
- 800 Views
Having now read one of the books mentioned, Cheryl Rainfield's Scars...
08/06/2011 02:18:23 AM
- 1024 Views