well so far you have failed to make the argument
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 07/06/2011 04:22:00 AM
Stating an opinion really isn't making an argument, it is just arguing. Early adolescence is a confusing time for most kids and they trying figure out what is normal and what the boundaries are. They have to many impulses they have not yet learned to control or deal with without showing them a twisted view of normal. Exposing them to honest works of average teens like Bloom does helps them to understand that. Exposing them melodramatic stories of the fringes of society just adds confusion. There is way to much celebration of the perverse and dysfunctional in our society and especially in our entertainment industry. Being an average teen is treated as weird while being out of control is treated as the norm. Kids who chose abstinence are treated as socially crippled losers while kids who promiscuous are shown as the norm.
You are right on one key point, kids need access to information and role models they can identify with there just needs to be a lot more judgment on how that information is presented.
You are right on one key point, kids need access to information and role models they can identify with there just needs to be a lot more judgment on how that information is presented.
This WSJ article has kicked up a huge fuss on the internet - YA is "too dark".
05/06/2011 03:46:50 PM
- 2073 Views
There's only one thing about this literature that disturbs me
05/06/2011 05:39:35 PM
- 1049 Views
This is a thought out, finely articulated response.
05/06/2011 06:47:13 PM
- 1063 Views
If it were just vampires that would be just fine
05/06/2011 08:03:02 PM
- 844 Views
People have been complaining about this since the novel was invented
05/06/2011 11:02:58 PM
- 915 Views
Apparently the article did paint far too bleak a picture,
06/06/2011 12:39:46 PM
- 1006 Views
Why waste time with "YA literature" at all?
06/06/2011 02:14:03 PM
- 783 Views
Re: Why waste time with "YA literature" at all?
06/06/2011 02:28:42 PM
- 740 Views
I think that's a post factum justification, not a reason.
06/06/2011 05:08:09 PM
- 929 Views
Maybe. It's hard to separate, I think.
07/06/2011 01:06:29 PM
- 969 Views
One certainly has to choose the real literature to present, certainly.
07/06/2011 02:27:00 PM
- 994 Views
Very good post.
06/06/2011 08:52:22 PM
- 807 Views
You seem to be the only one who thinks so.
*NM*
07/06/2011 01:17:18 AM
- 289 Views

I don't think it's a bad post... I just think that the "despair" is a teen fad, and not as bad as
07/06/2011 03:19:03 AM
- 1065 Views
Suicide rates have gone up significantly
07/06/2011 02:42:55 PM
- 735 Views
Heh.
08/06/2011 07:24:44 PM
- 1040 Views
you are having trouble finding cultural ideas that turned bad?
08/06/2011 11:56:23 PM
- 960 Views
The classic problem of the overprotective parent- underestimating your kids
09/06/2011 05:33:54 AM
- 898 Views
the classic problem of people who have no idea what they are talking about
09/06/2011 04:16:25 PM
- 846 Views
Are you really equating reading about trauma with trauma? They are not the same. *NM*
09/06/2011 07:10:34 PM
- 306 Views
I'm sure the percentage of good books must be higher than they make it sound,
05/06/2011 05:53:21 PM
- 1097 Views
I'd say books offer a fundamentally different experience than movies
05/06/2011 06:53:55 PM
- 1039 Views
I'm not sure that makes a difference here.
06/06/2011 04:47:05 AM
- 1022 Views
Because thinking makes you LESS susceptible to these things you're afraid of
06/06/2011 05:27:26 PM
- 1057 Views
I don't completely agree with that.
06/06/2011 07:26:21 PM
- 1005 Views
I feel like I just can't relate to parents determined to shelter their kids from everything
06/06/2011 10:21:44 PM
- 995 Views
To think the content described is acceptable, when they ban "Huck Finn" for using 'nigger'.
*NM*
05/06/2011 09:45:15 PM
- 316 Views

CNN: "On a website, a person named 'Macharius' used the 'N-word'".
06/06/2011 01:58:35 AM
- 783 Views
Parents have the right and resonsibility to know what their children are reading
06/06/2011 03:41:22 AM
- 811 Views
Re: Parents have the right and resonsibility to know what their children are reading
06/06/2011 12:40:24 PM
- 944 Views
I'd argue if you're old enough to be interested in the subject matter, you're old enough to read it
06/06/2011 05:32:33 PM
- 1072 Views
well so far you have failed to make the argument
07/06/2011 04:22:00 AM
- 998 Views
Depends on the subject matter.
07/06/2011 01:07:57 PM
- 821 Views
Basically? Yes.
07/06/2011 06:42:04 PM
- 1066 Views
why do think there is value in letting them read whatever they want?
07/06/2011 06:52:20 PM
- 737 Views
Don't be an idiot.
09/06/2011 05:25:26 AM
- 927 Views
Well, I wrote a long piece related to this
06/06/2011 05:21:06 AM
- 1012 Views
Great post. She really tries to muddy the waters relating to censorship and parenting.
06/06/2011 08:05:21 AM
- 892 Views
She kind of conflates some issues that are quite different, if you ask me.
06/06/2011 08:47:33 PM
- 941 Views
Wait wait wait wait wait... NYT reviewed Game of Thrones? I must read this
07/06/2011 03:20:08 AM
- 820 Views
Having now read one of the books mentioned, Cheryl Rainfield's Scars...
08/06/2011 02:18:23 AM
- 1046 Views