I was not prone to hand-wringing and profanities over the prepackaged garbage because there has always been prepackaged garbage, at least since Johnny Mathis in the late 1950s.
That's true enough. And I agree, I think we'll probably go insane if we try to point to one specific cause of suicide rates.
I don't know, I just feel things like this are constantly changing, and we're in the middle of it so it's hard to have a sense of perspective. Every month there's some new thing that is either destroying our world, our youth, our freedom or our brains. Sometimes it's a terrorist plot, and sometimes it's a new Bratz doll. It's hard to get excited about the newest threat to our humanity.
Finally, I think it can be nearly impossible to judge what, exactly, is a "threat," especially in terms of pop culture. For example, we're in the age of smartphones, Youtube, and near-instantaneous global communication. Is this a good thing, since it will make secrecy and corruption much more difficult, and help connect us as a global people? Or will it twist into a giant surveillance state, where the ability of anyone to be heard means that some crazy redneck or jihadist can post a rant on Youtube that goes viral and soon the entire world is arguing about it?
For another example, science-fiction was seen as brainless escapism. Yet it fueled interest in science, and I've read some very persuasive articles that bluntly state that without science fiction, we would not have made it to the moon.
On the flip side... hm. I'm trying to think of some cultural things that were considered "good," but turned out to be destructive in the end. McCarthyism, maybe? ...hm.
I hope I'm being clear; I've been told my analogies are often not as clear as I seem to think they are.
I amuse myself.
This WSJ article has kicked up a huge fuss on the internet - YA is "too dark".
05/06/2011 03:46:50 PM
- 2073 Views
There's only one thing about this literature that disturbs me
05/06/2011 05:39:35 PM
- 1049 Views
This is a thought out, finely articulated response.
05/06/2011 06:47:13 PM
- 1063 Views
If it were just vampires that would be just fine
05/06/2011 08:03:02 PM
- 844 Views
People have been complaining about this since the novel was invented
05/06/2011 11:02:58 PM
- 915 Views
Apparently the article did paint far too bleak a picture,
06/06/2011 12:39:46 PM
- 1006 Views
Why waste time with "YA literature" at all?
06/06/2011 02:14:03 PM
- 783 Views
Re: Why waste time with "YA literature" at all?
06/06/2011 02:28:42 PM
- 740 Views
I think that's a post factum justification, not a reason.
06/06/2011 05:08:09 PM
- 929 Views
Maybe. It's hard to separate, I think.
07/06/2011 01:06:29 PM
- 969 Views
One certainly has to choose the real literature to present, certainly.
07/06/2011 02:27:00 PM
- 994 Views
Very good post.
06/06/2011 08:52:22 PM
- 807 Views
You seem to be the only one who thinks so.
*NM*
07/06/2011 01:17:18 AM
- 289 Views

I don't think it's a bad post... I just think that the "despair" is a teen fad, and not as bad as
07/06/2011 03:19:03 AM
- 1065 Views
Suicide rates have gone up significantly
07/06/2011 02:42:55 PM
- 735 Views
Heh.
08/06/2011 07:24:44 PM
- 1040 Views
you are having trouble finding cultural ideas that turned bad?
08/06/2011 11:56:23 PM
- 960 Views
The classic problem of the overprotective parent- underestimating your kids
09/06/2011 05:33:54 AM
- 898 Views
the classic problem of people who have no idea what they are talking about
09/06/2011 04:16:25 PM
- 846 Views
Are you really equating reading about trauma with trauma? They are not the same. *NM*
09/06/2011 07:10:34 PM
- 306 Views
I'm sure the percentage of good books must be higher than they make it sound,
05/06/2011 05:53:21 PM
- 1097 Views
I'd say books offer a fundamentally different experience than movies
05/06/2011 06:53:55 PM
- 1039 Views
I'm not sure that makes a difference here.
06/06/2011 04:47:05 AM
- 1022 Views
Because thinking makes you LESS susceptible to these things you're afraid of
06/06/2011 05:27:26 PM
- 1057 Views
I don't completely agree with that.
06/06/2011 07:26:21 PM
- 1005 Views
I feel like I just can't relate to parents determined to shelter their kids from everything
06/06/2011 10:21:44 PM
- 995 Views
To think the content described is acceptable, when they ban "Huck Finn" for using 'nigger'.
*NM*
05/06/2011 09:45:15 PM
- 316 Views

CNN: "On a website, a person named 'Macharius' used the 'N-word'".
06/06/2011 01:58:35 AM
- 782 Views
Parents have the right and resonsibility to know what their children are reading
06/06/2011 03:41:22 AM
- 811 Views
Re: Parents have the right and resonsibility to know what their children are reading
06/06/2011 12:40:24 PM
- 944 Views
I'd argue if you're old enough to be interested in the subject matter, you're old enough to read it
06/06/2011 05:32:33 PM
- 1072 Views
Depends on the subject matter.
07/06/2011 01:07:57 PM
- 821 Views
Basically? Yes.
07/06/2011 06:42:04 PM
- 1066 Views
why do think there is value in letting them read whatever they want?
07/06/2011 06:52:20 PM
- 737 Views
Don't be an idiot.
09/06/2011 05:25:26 AM
- 927 Views
Well, I wrote a long piece related to this
06/06/2011 05:21:06 AM
- 1012 Views
Great post. She really tries to muddy the waters relating to censorship and parenting.
06/06/2011 08:05:21 AM
- 892 Views
She kind of conflates some issues that are quite different, if you ask me.
06/06/2011 08:47:33 PM
- 941 Views
Wait wait wait wait wait... NYT reviewed Game of Thrones? I must read this
07/06/2011 03:20:08 AM
- 820 Views
Having now read one of the books mentioned, Cheryl Rainfield's Scars...
08/06/2011 02:18:23 AM
- 1046 Views