Books Messageboard: That sounds very interesting. I want to read it. by Camilla

Back to Messageboard

Post New Thread

Help

Stats

Rules

That sounds very interesting. I want to read it. Camilla Send a noteboard - 26/06/2011 10:27:39 PM

In fact, I am putting it on my wishlist right now. I must say, without the review, the title would probably have put me off.

I'm sure we've all read some books, at some point during our education, that seemed weird and not particularly good when we were made to read them - but suddenly became a whole lot more interesting through the analysis and reflection that followed, thanks to some talented teacher. The opposite may also be the case, but let's keep things positive, shall we?

For me, something like that happened with the first of Carson McCullers' books I read, The Ballad of the Sad Café. It certainly didn't wow me at first, but after analyzing it in a surprisingly interesting group work, I came to like it rather well, even if I had to read it in translation.

As a result, McCullers' most famous book The Heart Is A Lonely Hunter has long been on my to-read list, and a few weeks ago I finally got around to buying it. As it turns out, the book is eerily similar to The Ballad of the Sad Café, so it felt quite familiar. Not quite as cryptic, which can be good or bad depending on your point of view, but on the whole probably a better book, alright.

Carson McCullers (or Lula Carson Smith, to take a leaf from Camilla's book and go with birth names) was born in Columbus, Georgia in 1917, and published this novel in 1940, aged twenty-three, having turned to writing after her delicate health had prematurely ended her hopes of a career in music. It's always both a blessing and a curse for a young writer to have your first book be a huge (critical) success, I suppose, but it certainly is an incredible achievement to have written this book at that age.

I find I get horrified when people write masterpieces when they were younger than I am now. It should not be allowed. Does her age show at all in the prose?

McCullers' focus, in this book like in her other one I read, and I've no doubt in the rest of her work, is on the people who stand apart from society somehow, the loners, the disabled, the "freaks". The working title of this novel was "The Mute", after the deaf and mute protagonist, John Singer. Singer lives in an unnamed town in the American South in the late 1930s, where he becomes surprisingly popular for his ability to look wise and say nothing. Four characters - a somewhat eccentric and philosophical café owner, a music-loving teenager girl, a drunken loner with Communist sympathies and a rather pedantic black doctor who wants to improve the lot of his race - fall under Singer's thrall, each considering him a kindred spirit and the only one they can talk to. Around this simple enough central structure, McCullers builds a solid plot, though as one might expect, the characters and the themes are probably more important than the plot in this book.

This sounds fascinating. It sounds like it is discussing the way we project our own interests onto other people instead of trying to make room for and understand their otherness, made more extreme by his muteness. </theory geek>

Is it written from the perspective of Singer?

The strongest storyline, in my opinion but I suspect many would agree, is the one with the black doctor, Benedict Copeland. The doctor is a tragic character, a highly educated man living in a time and a place where extremely few of his black peers were remotely near his level - and his white peers were cold at best. And, worse, a father whose dreams of raising his children to be highly educated professionals like himself, as his personal contribution to the improvement of the fate of the "Negro", ended in bitter disappointment and seriously strained relations with them. McCullers' novel is certainly nuanced in its treatment of the racial issues, and offers an interesting if cursory look at the different views among the black community on how to improve their fate, a quarter of a century before the end of segregation. And though the novel is not a political one at its heart, several other politico-economic topics are dealt with deftly, as characters reflect on the Depression, the New Deal and the fascism in Europe.

The central theme of the book is probably best described as passions, in the widest sense of the word, and how they can drive people apart instead of together. In that sense, the title certainly is well-chosen, even if it wasn't McCullers' original choice. As one might expect, the result is not a particularly cheerful novel, but the fairly open ending still leaves most characters with a fair shot at happiness, if they can take it.

I had high expectations for this book, and it easily met them. There have been some posts here by people looking for good American novels, good Southern novels and good westerns; the third category I'm afraid is even more of a stretch here than it was for To Kill a Mockingbird (sorry, Camilla

), but this certainly is a fine specimen of the former two categories. Highly recommended.

I have found the Western book. My boyfriend's father gave me a Norwegian classic western story. Classic pulp fiction, but classic. Proper genre western.

On a side note and a propos my Mockingbird review: would it not be good to put this on the front page. I feel you admins have been a little lax in that department lately. No new reviews added to the front page, none to the library. Those two things would make it easier for people to pick up on reviews if they drop off the page after the first day.

*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator

Reply to message

Carson McCullers - The Heart Is A Lonely Hunter Legolas - 20/06/2011 10:27:05 PM 8006 Views

That sounds very interesting. I want to read it. Camilla - 26/06/2011 10:27:39 PM 1605 Views

Legolas - 26/06/2011 10:43:28 PM 1356 Views

Back to Messageboard

Post New Thread

Help

Stats

Rules

Reply to Message

Subject

Formatting

Smiley Codes

Body

<quote id="214178">
In fact, I am putting it on my wishlist right now. I must say, without the review, the title would probably have put me off.

<quote id="213280">I'm sure we've all read some books, at some point during our education, that seemed weird and not particularly good when we were made to read them - but suddenly became a whole lot more interesting through the analysis and reflection that followed, thanks to some talented teacher. The opposite may also be the case, but let's keep things positive, shall we? :P For me, something like that happened with the first of Carson McCullers' books I read, The Ballad of the Sad Café. It certainly didn't wow me at first, but after analyzing it in a surprisingly interesting group work, I came to like it rather well, even if I had to read it in translation. </quote>
<quote id="213280">As a result, McCullers' most famous book The Heart Is A Lonely Hunter has long been on my to-read list, and a few weeks ago I finally got around to buying it. As it turns out, the book is eerily similar to The Ballad of the Sad Café, so it felt quite familiar. Not quite as cryptic, which can be good or bad depending on your point of view, but on the whole probably a better book, alright. </quote>
<quote id="213280">Carson McCullers (or Lula Carson Smith, to take a leaf from Camilla's book and go with birth names) was born in Columbus, Georgia in 1917, and published this novel in 1940, aged twenty-three, having turned to writing after her delicate health had prematurely ended her hopes of a career in music. It's always both a blessing and a curse for a young writer to have your first book be a huge (critical) success, I suppose, but it certainly is an incredible achievement to have written this book at that age. </quote>

I find I get horrified when people write masterpieces when they were younger than I am now. It should not be allowed. Does her age show at all in the prose?

<quote id="213280">McCullers' focus, in this book like in her other one I read, and I've no doubt in the rest of her work, is on the people who stand apart from society somehow, the loners, the disabled, the "freaks". The working title of this novel was "The Mute", after the deaf and mute protagonist, John Singer. Singer lives in an unnamed town in the American South in the late 1930s, where he becomes surprisingly popular for his ability to look wise and say nothing. Four characters - a somewhat eccentric and philosophical café owner, a music-loving teenager girl, a drunken loner with Communist sympathies and a rather pedantic black doctor who wants to improve the lot of his race - fall under Singer's thrall, each considering him a kindred spirit and the only one they can talk to. Around this simple enough central structure, McCullers builds a solid plot, though as one might expect, the characters and the themes are probably more important than the plot in this book. </quote>

Is it written from the perspective of Singer?

<quote id="213280">The strongest storyline, in my opinion but I suspect many would agree, is the one with the black doctor, Benedict Copeland. The doctor is a tragic character, a highly educated man living in a time and a place where extremely few of his black peers were remotely near his level - and his white peers were cold at best. And, worse, a father whose dreams of raising his children to be highly educated professionals like himself, as his personal contribution to the improvement of the fate of the "Negro", ended in bitter disappointment and seriously strained relations with them. McCullers' novel is certainly nuanced in its treatment of the racial issues, and offers an interesting if cursory look at the different views among the black community on how to improve their fate, a quarter of a century before the end of segregation. And though the novel is not a political one at its heart, several other politico-economic topics are dealt with deftly, as characters reflect on the Depression, the New Deal and the fascism in Europe. </quote>
<quote id="213280">The central theme of the book is probably best described as passions, in the widest sense of the word, and how they can drive people apart instead of together. In that sense, the title certainly is well-chosen, even if it wasn't McCullers' original choice. As one might expect, the result is not a particularly cheerful novel, but the fairly open ending still leaves most characters with a fair shot at happiness, if they can take it. </quote>
<quote id="213280">I had high expectations for this book, and it easily met them. There have been some posts here by people looking for good American novels, good Southern novels and good westerns; the third category I'm afraid is even more of a stretch here than it was for To Kill a Mockingbird (sorry, Camilla :P ), but this certainly is a fine specimen of the former two categories. Highly recommended. </quote>

I have found the Western book. My boyfriend's father gave me a Norwegian classic western story. Classic pulp fiction, but classic. Proper genre western.

On a side note and a propos my Mockingbird review: would it not be good to put this on the front page. I feel you admins have been a little lax in that department lately. No new reviews added to the front page, none to the library. Those two things would make it easier for people to pick up on reviews if they drop off the page after the first day. 
</quote>

Link title

Link url

Send notification emails?

Username

Password