You assume I care that much. I enjoy pointing out the absurdness of this author. - Edit 1
Before modification by Beqi at 02/08/2011 07:11:00 PM
I mean, if writing it first means everyone else is a derivative rip-off, then Jordan ripped off Goodkind by using that exact same story line for Egwene in KoD.
Plainly, by your logic, and the pretensions of Tom, whose eloquence, so hard-won in his smarter-than-thou book choices, appears to have deserted him in this thread, Jordancould only have stolen his idea from Goodkind. Plainly, he is right about his tremendous impact.
He used the same story line several times. I never once was awed or inspired by the writing. You weren't. I wasn't. Doesn't mean no one else is. Meanwhile the guy whose signature has a picture of Stalin can descend into spewing profanity in lieu of articulating any genuine criticism, about one of the most blatantly anti-communist works of fiction to reach a wide audience, and we're NOT supposed to think that maybe Goodkind has point about his critics?
However absurd his beliefs, he certainly articulates them with greater coherence and credibility than any of his critics in this thread.
Plainly, by your logic, and the pretensions of Tom, whose eloquence, so hard-won in his smarter-than-thou book choices, appears to have deserted him in this thread, Jordancould only have stolen his idea from Goodkind. Plainly, he is right about his tremendous impact.
He used the same story line several times. I never once was awed or inspired by the writing.
However absurd his beliefs, he certainly articulates them with greater coherence and credibility than any of his critics in this thread.
Oh why I quit. Maybe that was when I stopped taking acid. I woke up and realized this shit book didn't deserve my hard earned money. Then I took a look at how the author portrayed himself to the world. And decided that his weak tea stories didn't deserve my time wasted on them anymore.