to love popular fiction and be unashamed of it.
The fact this one's tastes seem to range so wide and the fact he dared omit many big names whose work didn't have much of a personal impact on him as a reader actually make me far more curious and interested to read his book.
It makes me think of one of the favourite teachers I've ever had, who could on a whim spend a full course to talk about why he thought Milan Kundera was the greatest living novelist after he finished The Unbearable Lightness of Being and was just dying to share his passion for it, or who would tell us he's re reading Flaubert each year for the beauty of his prose... but could also be seen reading Stephen King or P.D. James between classes from time to time. And if you asked, it would have had something intelligent and interesting to say about those writers or why he enjoyed them.
But Jordan?
To be fair, I am talking out of resentment for a mis-spent youth here.

I'm too young to be part of that fanbase, but I've heard and seen many things about this "older fanbase" over the years, and interacted with quite a few personally. I've known a 70 y.o., an old fashioned southern lady, who loved WOT and told me many others around her did. She loved his humour, called what some refer to as "his slow pace" leisurly and taking the proper time to tell a story.
In general in my personal experience, Jordan's fans who are over 45/50 y.o. are far more patient with his storytelling style, and far more appreciative of the later books in the series. They know his flaws, but still enjoy the books. Very often, it's also people who expect of Jordan a good journey and who didn't obsess with him reaching the finale (we've known for several years how this will end. It's the archetypal good vs. evil story). It's often people who don't like so much most of the contemporary genre fiction and its pacing. They're also not into WOT for its literary qualities (and have near zero interest in debating the literary merits or lack of merits of Jordan) and are perfectly aware this isn't Jane Austen or Salinger... You'd also find quite a few among them who believe WOT is an untimely return to a certain type of quite old fashioned popular literature (and it's after all what Jordan wanted to do, he's cited (or his cousin mentionend to me) many things L'Amour to Dumas and big pop historical sagas as influences behind WOT. Jordan was described to me as an omnivorous reader. He read a lot of great literature, but he was a great lover of pop literature as well. He chose to be a popular writer, by choice and because he was perfectly aware his strengths were his imagination, his ability to tell immersing stories - he's done that socially since he was a kid I was told - and amusing an audience, not in formal work with the language as the "great writers" do) and they appreciate that in Jordan.
I'm approaching 45 (gulp!) and I know many people around me who discriminated massively between 20 and 40, focussing almost exclusively in absorbing great works or following the diktats of the literary critics when choosing contemporary novelists, but who more and more are returning to popular literature as well. Out of pleasure.
And my mom who's doing the exact opposite. She's mixed "serious" reading with pop lit all her adult life (she always loved pop lit. because it relaxed her and because she could read those books anywhere and in any conditions and still enjoy them, whereas the more serious literature she studied once and loves too she thought she was totally losing her time with when she couldn't read in good conditions. She saw no point in plowing through Proust with screaming kids or while rushing to prepare supper, or when she didn't have the mental energy left to read for more than half and hour before sleep, when to appreciate Proust you need to be in the good conditions to get totally immersed in his language). But after she retired, mom stopped reading pop lit and decided from now on she'd revisit writers she's loved and read classic and contemporary novels she didn't have enough "quality reading time" for earlier. It's not that she doesn't love a good thriller or Harry Potter, but she thinks she gets more from great literature and non-fiction nowadays. She reads about 20 pop lit. books per year now, but all of them during what she still calls "the summer vacations". She similarly has stopped going to see blockbusters or to watch TV series - she's decided to devote her the time she reserves for movies frin now on to discover the great directors.
Dad on the other hand had a classical education and kept reading mostly non-fiction and literature during his working life, and nowadays when he reads he reads strictly to relax, so his choices are the worst kind of "fluff". He tried and hated Tolkien. To him it was too much of an in-between, too laborious and not well written enough to be bring him anything the great writers have not done much better, and still too complex to relax, so he stopped a third of the way in and watched the movies instead, as he liked the story.

John Sutherland's Lives of Novelists includes Jordan, but not Tolkien
07/12/2011 04:43:14 PM
- 937 Views
Re: John Sutherland's Lives of Novelists includes Jordan, but not Tolkien
08/12/2011 02:19:14 AM
- 671 Views
to be fair, every generation says culture is going down the drain
08/12/2011 03:04:27 AM
- 614 Views

The article states that the novelists chosen were of personal interest to the author. *NM*
08/12/2011 09:01:09 AM
- 233 Views
My mind boggles a little
08/12/2011 09:47:23 AM
- 699 Views
Why not?
All of us did at one point or another.
08/12/2011 03:55:52 PM
- 716 Views

Although Sutherland was hardly a teenager like most of us when he read them. *NM*
08/12/2011 04:15:04 PM
- 237 Views
Well...he's hardly the first scholar...
09/12/2011 02:29:25 AM
- 766 Views