Active Users:1680 Time:16/03/2026 05:19:40 AM
The speech patterns were intentional, but not meant to be "archaic". Tom Send a noteboard - 14/12/2011 04:02:55 AM
They were an attempt at reducing the language of the characters to actual Germanic roots, Old English whenever possible, and avoiding Latin roots and Norman French irruptions as much as possible. I find that a wonderful achievement.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
J.R.R. Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings - 12/12/2011 04:25:26 AM 1861 Views
Thank you for reposting these. - 12/12/2011 04:36:06 PM 1132 Views
Interestingly enough - 13/12/2011 12:10:08 AM 972 Views
Re: Interestingly enough - 13/12/2011 12:42:10 PM 964 Views
I think - 13/12/2011 01:21:41 PM 1021 Views
Probably, yes, but still no excuse for allowing the worldbuilding to overpower the story being told. - 13/12/2011 04:00:23 PM 954 Views
We'll have to disagree. - 14/12/2011 12:46:23 AM 978 Views
Alright. - 14/12/2011 12:40:25 PM 1049 Views
for the sake of the history/epic? - 14/12/2011 02:40:33 PM 944 Views
Everyone cares about their own bit of history. - 14/12/2011 04:24:16 PM 950 Views
Agreed - 23/12/2011 05:27:02 AM 968 Views
The speech patterns were intentional, but not meant to be "archaic". - 14/12/2011 04:02:55 AM 1023 Views
Oh, I know that - 14/12/2011 08:25:53 AM 1023 Views
I love the dialogue in LOTR. a more modern voice would be terrible *NM* - 15/12/2011 06:09:18 PM 475 Views
You might want to re-read what I said more carefully - 15/12/2011 07:03:23 PM 1020 Views

Reply to Message