Active Users:346 Time:06/07/2025 04:26:31 AM
The speech patterns were intentional, but not meant to be "archaic". Tom Send a noteboard - 14/12/2011 04:02:55 AM
They were an attempt at reducing the language of the characters to actual Germanic roots, Old English whenever possible, and avoiding Latin roots and Norman French irruptions as much as possible. I find that a wonderful achievement.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
J.R.R. Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings - 12/12/2011 04:25:26 AM 1744 Views
Thank you for reposting these. - 12/12/2011 04:36:06 PM 1031 Views
Interestingly enough - 13/12/2011 12:10:08 AM 871 Views
Re: Interestingly enough - 13/12/2011 12:42:10 PM 858 Views
I think - 13/12/2011 01:21:41 PM 921 Views
Probably, yes, but still no excuse for allowing the worldbuilding to overpower the story being told. - 13/12/2011 04:00:23 PM 861 Views
We'll have to disagree. - 14/12/2011 12:46:23 AM 881 Views
Alright. - 14/12/2011 12:40:25 PM 952 Views
for the sake of the history/epic? - 14/12/2011 02:40:33 PM 847 Views
Everyone cares about their own bit of history. - 14/12/2011 04:24:16 PM 841 Views
Agreed - 23/12/2011 05:27:02 AM 870 Views
The speech patterns were intentional, but not meant to be "archaic". - 14/12/2011 04:02:55 AM 929 Views
Oh, I know that - 14/12/2011 08:25:53 AM 924 Views
I love the dialogue in LOTR. a more modern voice would be terrible *NM* - 15/12/2011 06:09:18 PM 410 Views
You might want to re-read what I said more carefully - 15/12/2011 07:03:23 PM 919 Views

Reply to Message