Active Users:842 Time:30/03/2026 05:02:31 AM
The "begats" shouldn't be bypassed at all. Tom Send a noteboard - 01/02/2012 08:10:48 PM
There's an incredible amount of information that those "begats" give the reader. There are 42 generations, broken into a trinity of 14s. The numerological implication is significant, as 42 signifies the end of tribulation (i.e., the Messiah has come). Furthermore, the names remind the reader of the continuity with the Old Testament, which is important from a traditional Christian standpoint to refute groups that wanted to discard the Old Testament completely. It's why Matthew comes first in the New Testament, actually.

Not only that, but there are further implications. The reader is reminded of the original covenant with Abraham, of the Exodus, the anointing of David and the promise made that the Messiah would arise from his house, the Babylonian exile and the entire spiritual tradition of the Jews.

Furthermore, the whole concept of Hebrew tradition is stood on its head at the very end. The list begins like one of the numerous lists from the Old Testament, then ends by reminding us that Joseph was not Jesus's father. Spiritually, Jesus is the descendant of this house, but physically he is not. He fulfills the promise made, over and over again, to the forebears of Joseph but he comes directly from God.

Also, the unusual circumstances of his birth are legitimized by mention of the four other women prior to Mary who get referenced in that whole list of "begats". Tamar, who posed as a prostitute to have sex with her father-in-law, Rahab, the prostitute of Jericho who hid the Israelite spies before Joshua had the town destroyed, Ruth, who was a Moabite and not even Jewish and whose marriage to Boaz was very unconventional, and Bathsheba, who committed adultery with David while her husband Uriah was fighting in the army (and placed so as to die).

There's a reason why they're mentioned. Anyone reading that whole list and familiar with the stories sees how everything comes together perfectly. All those "begats" are incredibly important in tying the Old Testament to the New.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Inspired by The Guardian, which books (classic or otherwise) do you think could be shorter? - 30/01/2012 02:10:22 PM 1452 Views
What'll happen if I mention The Count of Monte Cristo? - 30/01/2012 02:25:56 PM 996 Views
LOL - 30/01/2012 04:30:07 PM 1161 Views
- 30/01/2012 05:05:19 PM 976 Views
The Wheel of Time. *NM* - 30/01/2012 02:59:03 PM 507 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 30/01/2012 03:10:23 PM 395 Views
Hmph. *NM* - 30/01/2012 10:05:04 PM 423 Views
Hmph indeed. *NM* - 31/01/2012 05:38:18 PM 420 Views
<3 *NM* - 31/01/2012 06:01:10 PM 383 Views
Exactly. - 30/01/2012 03:26:23 PM 1001 Views
I'd really love someone to do a good job of this. - 30/01/2012 04:29:01 PM 952 Views
I don't think Ivanhoe really needs to be pruned - 30/01/2012 03:22:37 PM 1001 Views
Mansfield Park needs a jolly good rework. - 30/01/2012 04:34:54 PM 940 Views
In fairness, all Mansfield Park needs to be cut is its heroine... - 30/01/2012 10:34:43 PM 1018 Views
War and Peace. That second epilogue really has to go. - 30/01/2012 10:37:28 PM 1097 Views
"Could" be shorter doesn't always mean "should" be shorter. - 31/01/2012 02:18:44 AM 1067 Views
Re: "Could" be shorter doesn't always mean "should" be shorter. - 31/01/2012 04:00:13 AM 1069 Views
I agree. I would even go farther than that. - 01/02/2012 07:59:13 PM 1096 Views
Re: I agree. I would even go farther than that. - 02/02/2012 12:51:45 PM 1171 Views
I don't really think any book should be abridged - 31/01/2012 09:50:34 AM 1076 Views
The Bible. Although I hear it's sort of been abridged before. - 31/01/2012 04:46:28 PM 1035 Views
Why would you cut out Matthew 1? - 31/01/2012 05:11:24 PM 931 Views
Not all of it. - 01/02/2012 04:14:13 PM 1102 Views
The "begats" shouldn't be bypassed at all. - 01/02/2012 08:10:48 PM 925 Views
Tom. Thanks for that information. *NM* - 02/02/2012 02:10:34 PM 512 Views
Everything by Ayn Rand. - 31/01/2012 05:46:11 PM 936 Views
Everything by Thomas Hardy - 02/02/2012 02:27:03 PM 968 Views

Reply to Message