240-386.M41 (40,240-40,386 AD): The events of the EISENHORN trilogy take place. The RAVENOR trilogy takes place within a century of the end of this series.
In the third book, I recall it was the year 404, which was a key in how they were using the time portal which introduced them to the Tyrannids in the first place (at one point it sent them to the year 404 in the wrong millenium).But it also doesn't explain how Eisenhorn and Aemos are tossing around the term tyranid like it's common knowledge, especially since they have not yet earned the name implied by the following:
741.M41: First official contact between the Imperium and the Tyranids when Hive Fleet Behemoth invades the Tyran system.
Even if Eisenhorn and the inquisition had secretly discovered them, why would they be calling them a name based on a system they had not yet invaded?
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Can someone explain something about Warhammer 40,000 continuity to me?
- 21/12/2012 03:47:27 PM
1337 Views
Still a bit new to the WH40K Universe myself, but just a few pseudo-answers.
- 21/12/2012 06:00:19 PM
1126 Views
That's a huge help, but also a bit of a shock
- 22/12/2012 12:11:35 AM
1076 Views
grey knights are a discrete unit, deathwatch are like delta force *NM*
- 24/12/2012 02:30:44 AM
339 Views
Space Marines, the Inquisition, and the Empire of Man
- 26/12/2012 03:05:58 PM
738 Views
Thank you. I have actually just read "The Emperor's Gift" by Aaron Dembski-Bowden, which helps
- 27/12/2012 01:06:42 AM
961 Views
Re: Thank you. I have actually just read "The Emperor's Gift" by Aaron Dembski-Bowden, which helps
- 27/12/2012 02:17:07 PM
1136 Views