Active Users:226 Time:30/04/2024 05:20:32 AM
LOL! - Edit 1

Before modification by DomA at 26/05/2014 10:07:59 PM


View original postI don't know about you, but to me that contrast is obvious. Nabokov manages to convey quite a bit of information without having to say much at all. Sanderson, by contrast, makes me want to clutch my head and scream out, "Too much description!" It's gross. It's vomited out on the page for people with no imagination. I'm surprised he didn't have Wax's vital statistics in a sidebar so that there would be no ambiguity about exactly how his hero looks.

Another good example of his weakness in this department is how many scenes he needs to write for the little plot development/character progression he must cover.

Jordan had what.. 2 Gawyn POVs in the whole series? And about what...20 scenes in which he appears? Sanderson had a ton of Gawyn chapters, completely useless except to him, because of his own admission he didn't "get" Gawyn, so we were given his "walk through" of trying to make sense of the character. All material which should have been considered "preparatory" and end up in the thrash can once he did "get" the character and was ready to move on.

He does that too in his own novels, a lot. It's very curious that writers from the "multi-tasking" and "fast-paced with lots of ellipses" generation used to TV/movies language very often suffer from this weakness, and seem condemned to a step-by-step pedestrian progression in their storytelling. As for abuses of bland descriptions, that seems to be a flaw inherited from trying to make things "cinematic" rather than literary.

Brandon has fairly little instinct for what needs to be told and what should be cut. That is linked in part with a weakness at handling inner thoughts of his characters, forcing him to have nearly everything happen "on screen" at length, when some things are worth only a brief allusion in later inner thoughts or dialogue.




Return to message