Active Users:138 Time:22/08/2019 05:32:27 AM
Re: I liked it a lot, but Cannoli is right re: Caesar. Rebekah Send a noteboard - 12/01/2016 03:26:56 PM

View original post
View original postI'm about halfway through First Man of Rome (hard to tell on a Kindle, mind you) and I'm wondering how historically accurate it is.


View original postIt's very accurate in the sense that if you read the whole series, you'll know an astonishing amount of detail about the period of about 110 BC to 27 BC in Rome, and few if any details are provably wrong, at least. But it's true that, aside from a general tendency to pick the interpretation that makes for the best story, she's an unabashed fangirl for Caesar, and later to a lesser extent Antony and Cleopatra.

I'm really enjoying the detail of things like legal situations, etc. It's kind of like applying knowledge to a lifelike situation.
View original postThe first two-three books are probably the best, because they mostly deal with Marius and Sulla whose rivalry is depicted in a more balanced way, and most readers are less likely to know that period in such detail already. By the time you hit the final book, titled simply 'Antony and Cleopatra', you're treading well-worn ground to say the least.


View original post
View original postI might also need recommendations for a good factual book on that time period - possibly from 200BC to AD100 or something like that. Any suggestions?


View original postI enjoyed Adrian Goldsworthy's biographies of Caesar and Antony/Cleopatra respectively (see my reviews here and here), as well as his book on the later decline of Rome.

Thanks, will look those up.
View original postFor the period inbetween, the early emperors, you could do worse than to go back to the primary sources for all later works, Suetonius' Twelve Caesars, or Tacitus' more detailed works on the mid-1st century AD. A modern work might be a bit more accurate / less biased than Suetonius though.

Hm. Not sure my post-child brain will cope with those if they're dry...
View original postNo idea on a single book covering the whole period, but I'll be interested to see if others can name some. Would be especially interested in the second century BC.

signature_images/107.gif

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Reply to message
Who has read Colleen McCullough's Rome series? - 10/01/2016 08:43:03 PM 570 Views
Sort of - 11/01/2016 11:15:48 AM 312 Views
Re: Sort of - 12/01/2016 03:24:59 PM 316 Views
I liked it a lot, but Cannoli is right re: Caesar. - 11/01/2016 05:49:10 PM 319 Views
Re: I liked it a lot, but Cannoli is right re: Caesar. - 12/01/2016 03:26:56 PM 361 Views
Suetonius at least is far from dry - he has all the juicy stories. - 12/01/2016 06:26:53 PM 386 Views
haven't read book but kindle tells you how much is left *NM* - 11/01/2016 05:57:08 PM 159 Views
Yes, I found that last night. I'm only 1/4 through! - 11/01/2016 06:06:47 PM 395 Views
Mary Beard's SPQR is the book of the moment - 12/01/2016 02:00:32 PM 356 Views

Reply to Message