Active Users:195 Time:19/05/2024 06:00:18 AM
Well, most spaceships have to go in-atmosphere at some point. Kronin al'Sulc Send a noteboard - 20/10/2009 04:09:16 AM
And honestly - when you build a spacecraft, the fact that ice is cheaper is not a major factor. Weight factors in too, I believe. You'd need a good thick coat of ice to make it useful, and then propulsion would be a problem. You'd have to calculate the trade-off.


I really don't think weight would be much of a factor when you're talking about a SPACE ship. The whole idea is that you are in space, where if you have forgotten, you are WEIGHTLESS.....


Unless it's a universe with an orbital docking station, and then shuttles planetside.
At last, I have an apostrophe!

*MySmiley*
Foil fencers Dance the Spears. Or, at least, the foils.

Too stubborn to remove that extraneous *MySmiley*

~The Decapitator~
Reply to message
anyone seen ice used as shielding for ships in SF - 19/10/2009 04:35:45 PM 3345 Views
Sounds familiar, but I'm not quite sure from where... *NM* - 19/10/2009 05:03:03 PM 120 Views
Ice shielding against lasers? - 19/10/2009 07:28:51 PM 1656 Views
It wouldn't reflect, but it would significantly diffract... *NM* - 19/10/2009 09:25:16 PM 123 Views
Perhaps... - 20/10/2009 08:31:08 AM 250 Views
Re: Ice shielding against lasers? - 20/10/2009 03:39:25 AM 1925 Views
Well, most spaceships have to go in-atmosphere at some point. - 20/10/2009 04:09:16 AM 292 Views
yep, orbital docking stations - 20/10/2009 05:21:40 PM 268 Views
momentum. Read up on it. *NM* - 20/10/2009 08:28:25 AM 110 Views
there might not be weight, but MASS still plays a role - 20/10/2009 05:21:08 PM 270 Views
Ignorance or sarcasm? - 20/10/2009 09:26:31 PM 277 Views
Chasm City by Alastair Reynolds *NM* - 23/10/2009 01:49:21 AM 143 Views

Reply to Message