Active Users:590 Time:15/12/2025 01:07:38 AM
well, clearly you did not understand everything. jh Send a noteboard - 21/10/2009 10:55:08 PM
I suppose one could read the Baroque Cycle too, but I sort of feel you need to have read Cryptonomicon before that... easier way to start understanding how he uses his shaftoes and waterhouses.

And honestly I liked it quite a bit more than Cryptonomicon, for whatever reason.

Sorry to shoot your theory out of the water. I'm just in a water-theory-shooter kind of mood today.


How could you possibly understand the stuff that goes on in the Baroque cycle without cryptonomicon? And you fail to realise that it is one of the best books ever - see, your theories can't even hold water, let alone shoot water out of something else.
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world" - Calvin.
Reply to message
Anyone read Neal Stephenson's ANATHEM? - 20/10/2009 06:13:58 PM 1150 Views
No, but I am thoroughly enjoying Quicksilver - 20/10/2009 06:36:51 PM 778 Views
It is at that. - 20/10/2009 07:08:12 PM 832 Views
Re: It is at that. - 20/10/2009 07:10:17 PM 900 Views
You see, i'm the complete opposite - 20/10/2009 07:28:17 PM 916 Views
He is most certainly not for everyone. - 20/10/2009 08:08:36 PM 782 Views
I read him in small pieces - 20/10/2009 08:21:51 PM 818 Views
Yep, good book, not his best. - 20/10/2009 07:27:03 PM 811 Views
I agree. - 20/10/2009 08:06:41 PM 817 Views
Oddly enough it was probably my favorite so far. *NM* - 20/10/2009 10:22:51 PM 342 Views
So what is his best? - 21/10/2009 12:03:15 AM 802 Views
Cryptonomicon, most likely. - 21/10/2009 06:30:52 AM 832 Views
I started reading him with Cryptonomicon - 21/10/2009 05:12:51 PM 893 Views
I read the Baroque Cycle first. - 21/10/2009 09:47:35 PM 792 Views
well, clearly you did not understand everything. - 21/10/2009 10:55:08 PM 831 Views
... Bwa? - 22/10/2009 12:07:09 AM 786 Views
My point exactly! *NM* - 22/10/2009 06:36:32 AM 378 Views
Your point is nonsense? ... Yeah, I guess that's typical. *NM* - 22/10/2009 03:37:50 PM 826 Views
Same for me - 22/10/2009 12:10:52 PM 896 Views
Me third. *NM* - 22/10/2009 09:23:31 PM 333 Views
You don't have to do a full summarization. - 20/10/2009 08:27:49 PM 861 Views
yes, several times, which is not my norm... - 21/10/2009 02:30:04 AM 827 Views
It's a fascinating read... - 21/10/2009 02:40:24 AM 813 Views
That was one of my predominant thoughts throughout... - 21/10/2009 02:06:34 PM 901 Views
I bought it about a month ago, but haven't read it yet. - 21/10/2009 04:26:20 AM 879 Views
I bought it not last weekend, but the weekend before. And then read it all in about 2 days. - 21/10/2009 09:06:17 AM 1111 Views
I feel pretty much exactly the same way. - 21/10/2009 01:58:47 PM 1008 Views
I think uncertain is probably the best description - 27/10/2009 11:26:11 AM 882 Views
Well, I think he has some ideas of the implications. - 27/10/2009 05:53:01 PM 844 Views
I bought it a few weeks ago. Not got around to reading it yet. - 21/10/2009 01:20:06 PM 816 Views
In that case, - 21/10/2009 02:07:13 PM 848 Views
Excellent - 21/10/2009 03:20:02 PM 937 Views
Yes. Awesome book. - 21/10/2009 03:00:21 PM 761 Views
Looking back, I can't remember reading it. I one hundred percent see it in my head as a movie. - 21/10/2009 11:29:15 PM 909 Views
That's often how I remember Stephenson's books. - 22/10/2009 02:34:40 PM 776 Views
That's a great point. - 22/10/2009 05:43:24 PM 857 Views
Snow Crash also has the best named main character of all time: Hiro Protagonist - 23/10/2009 01:39:26 AM 909 Views
Hiro's my hero - 23/10/2009 05:05:48 PM 987 Views

Reply to Message