For me at least, it changes with each story, and each telling.
unr3stricted Send a noteboard - 02/11/2009 07:47:59 PM
In Jordan's WoT, there is TONS of explanation. there is a "scientific" explanation to much of the magic system, and it works. Part of the fun of that series IMO, is that i like to see how it all comes together. Just like in House, or CSI or any of those sort of shows, the magic is in how everything matches up, or in how things are countered. And the SPECIFIC knowledge of that makes it interesting. The knowledge of exactly how the main character etc just defeated the bad guy is better than just knowing that it happened.
On the other hand, there are books like GRRM's aSoIaF series, where magic is neither common, nor scientific. Pretty much just classic "magic" in the sense that it is sorcerers/witches/etc doing whatever it is they do, and OUR characters observing it. There is a certain level of mysticism that is enjoyable there as well, WANTING to know how it is done but not knowing. For me anyways.
I see the problem coming in where authors try and mix mystical and fantastical with scientific. Whenever an author tries to do that, I lose all interest in the magic system. When Terry Brooks tried to go all scientific instead of magical, i lost interest in the entire series. I almost had that experience with Erikson but he didn't go so far.
But that all is just me, I'm interested to see what others think.
On the other hand, there are books like GRRM's aSoIaF series, where magic is neither common, nor scientific. Pretty much just classic "magic" in the sense that it is sorcerers/witches/etc doing whatever it is they do, and OUR characters observing it. There is a certain level of mysticism that is enjoyable there as well, WANTING to know how it is done but not knowing. For me anyways.
I see the problem coming in where authors try and mix mystical and fantastical with scientific. Whenever an author tries to do that, I lose all interest in the magic system. When Terry Brooks tried to go all scientific instead of magical, i lost interest in the entire series. I almost had that experience with Erikson but he didn't go so far.
But that all is just me, I'm interested to see what others think.
What is the purpose of a "good" magic system in fantasy?
- 02/11/2009 05:15:29 PM
1024 Views
For me at least, it changes with each story, and each telling.
- 02/11/2009 07:47:59 PM
702 Views
A "good" system can enhance the otherness of the world or characters.
- 02/11/2009 08:34:02 PM
676 Views
Warbreaker felt like it had a lot of untapped potential
- 03/11/2009 05:55:23 AM
597 Views
A part of that is planned, and another part is due to a growing author.
- 03/11/2009 03:11:58 PM
762 Views
I think it takes a couple of things to make a good magic system
- 02/11/2009 09:25:42 PM
582 Views
Concequence is certainly interesting.
- 03/11/2009 04:02:58 PM
632 Views
Indeed.
- 03/11/2009 04:16:41 PM
639 Views
Have you described this here or at Wotmania before?
- 04/11/2009 09:25:01 AM
663 Views
I wrote a little about it at wotmania when Danu was having her last big writing contest.
- 04/11/2009 02:34:51 PM
572 Views
I really don't care as long as it is not horribly inconsistent.
- 03/11/2009 07:47:48 AM
626 Views
The problem with heroes is they are just making it up as the go along
- 03/11/2009 06:49:25 PM
606 Views
That is not without a whole lot of precident in comics. *NM*
- 03/11/2009 08:04:48 PM
254 Views
It doesn't really make a for an internally consisnt magic system OR plot, though.
*NM*
- 03/11/2009 08:14:59 PM
290 Views
*NM*
- 03/11/2009 08:14:59 PM
290 Views
