Active Users:904 Time:07/02/2026 04:51:29 PM
I have not read Moorcock's rant... LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 03/12/2009 07:17:45 PM
but based on the defense against it, I have a feeling it wasn't the result of a very unbiased honest read. If he came to the conclusions that The Cimmerian refutes...I can't help fut feel he must have gone into it with the intent to negatively criticize.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
The Cimmerian refutes Moorcock's anti-Tolkien rant - 03/12/2009 05:40:47 PM 1520 Views
As a fan of Tolkien, I may be biased. - 03/12/2009 07:02:35 PM 708 Views
I have not read Moorcock's rant... - 03/12/2009 07:17:45 PM 663 Views
How can he assault Tolkien's prose? - 03/12/2009 07:47:25 PM 726 Views
I know, how dare he not default to latin - 03/12/2009 09:03:09 PM 637 Views
I don't think that was an attack... *NM* - 03/12/2009 09:53:15 PM 266 Views
It wasn't. *NM* - 03/12/2009 10:13:56 PM 266 Views
i was being sarcastic - 03/12/2009 11:14:45 PM 663 Views
Pretty much agreed, except I don't think it was a rant. - 04/12/2009 05:22:54 PM 663 Views
I Was Unaware of the Rant As Well As Moorcock's Sympathies With Pullman. - 06/12/2009 12:15:06 PM 1156 Views

Reply to Message