Active Users:428 Time:24/03/2026 07:15:10 PM
I have not read Moorcock's rant... LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 03/12/2009 07:17:45 PM
but based on the defense against it, I have a feeling it wasn't the result of a very unbiased honest read. If he came to the conclusions that The Cimmerian refutes...I can't help fut feel he must have gone into it with the intent to negatively criticize.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
The Cimmerian refutes Moorcock's anti-Tolkien rant - 03/12/2009 05:40:47 PM 1537 Views
As a fan of Tolkien, I may be biased. - 03/12/2009 07:02:35 PM 721 Views
I have not read Moorcock's rant... - 03/12/2009 07:17:45 PM 678 Views
How can he assault Tolkien's prose? - 03/12/2009 07:47:25 PM 737 Views
I know, how dare he not default to latin - 03/12/2009 09:03:09 PM 650 Views
I don't think that was an attack... *NM* - 03/12/2009 09:53:15 PM 271 Views
It wasn't. *NM* - 03/12/2009 10:13:56 PM 272 Views
i was being sarcastic - 03/12/2009 11:14:45 PM 677 Views
Pretty much agreed, except I don't think it was a rant. - 04/12/2009 05:22:54 PM 673 Views
I Was Unaware of the Rant As Well As Moorcock's Sympathies With Pullman. - 06/12/2009 12:15:06 PM 1165 Views

Reply to Message