Wait, you give Vallejo, Royo, and Bell as examples of art that shows something more believable?
lord-of-shadow Send a noteboard - 08/02/2010 08:00:53 PM
Maybe I've been looking at the wrong pieces from those artists, but all three of them seem to specialize in naked barbarian chicks, occasionally being molested by some grotesque demon. I'd take shallow, marketing-driven art over their erotic, hyper-sexualized Conan The Barbarian schlock any day of the week.
And I don't mind the new D&D art-style as much as most of you seem to. But that seems to boil down to pure taste, so there's not much to argue about there.
And I don't mind the new D&D art-style as much as most of you seem to. But that seems to boil down to pure taste, so there's not much to argue about there.
This message last edited by lord-of-shadow on 08/02/2010 at 08:04:54 PM
Is it just me or is contemporary fantasy art crap?
- 08/02/2010 02:37:40 AM
1238 Views
You might get a better response with this on the sci-fi/fantasy board. 
*NM*
- 08/02/2010 06:50:24 AM
417 Views
*NM*
- 08/02/2010 06:50:24 AM
417 Views
You're wearing the good ol' rose-tinted glasses. Also, do you have any non-D&D examples?
- 08/02/2010 06:21:06 PM
980 Views
First, D&D 4.0 is marketed at WoW players.
- 08/02/2010 07:44:47 PM
1182 Views
Wait, you give Vallejo, Royo, and Bell as examples of art that shows something more believable?
- 08/02/2010 08:00:53 PM
922 Views