Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 13/05/2010 11:16:07 PM
If I said she was acting like that, sure. But I said "it can come across." All I meant was that posting more than one thread on the same topic in very rapid succession can annoy some people, in much the same way that Dragonsoul and traska's one-track style of posting annoys people. I think that was pretty clear from my post, but maybe it was worded ambiguously.
Two threads, with two days between them, and the later post was linking to an amusing article. Sure, Werthead posted another thread about the same thing at almost the same time two days ago, and there have been threads from others too, but that's hardly her fault.
Less ambiguously, then, I think the phrase "keep it in one thread" applies here. And yes, that should apply to US politics too, but as I very rarely create threads on US politics I don't exactly know why you're taking me to task on it.
"Keep it in one thread" is one thing, but that wasn't what Greg was complaining about, it wasn't what people were ganging up on her about, and it wasn't what your previous two posts were about.
And as for why I take you to task and not someone else: the usual reason, yours was the one reply too many that made it look like everybody ganging up on her for no good reason that I can see.
How to live with the Tories
13/05/2010 12:33:49 PM
- 1052 Views
Her 101 reasons to love our Tory government was even better.
13/05/2010 12:42:39 PM
- 713 Views
What an even-handed, stereotype-free, and balanced piece of journalism. *NM*
13/05/2010 02:07:35 PM
- 331 Views
Your partisanship is getting annoying, actually.
13/05/2010 06:55:28 PM
- 788 Views
I'm sorry I care about politics.
13/05/2010 08:45:26 PM
- 727 Views
It's easy to complain. Actually doing something is rather more difficult. *NM*
13/05/2010 10:17:47 PM
- 301 Views
What do you suggest I do, pray tell? *NM*
13/05/2010 10:19:30 PM
- 283 Views
Learn how to live with people who disagree with you.
13/05/2010 10:21:08 PM
- 631 Views
Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:29:38 PM
- 747 Views
Do you really spell it "superiour" in Britain? That's wonderful.
13/05/2010 10:37:21 PM
- 779 Views
Pretty please with sugar on top
13/05/2010 10:50:48 PM
- 705 Views
Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:02:11 PM
- 672 Views
Re: Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:03:42 PM
- 637 Views
Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:08:48 PM
- 665 Views
Re: Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:11:04 PM
- 660 Views
I don't mind transference of anger, but let's keep my quotes accurate at least.
13/05/2010 11:15:37 PM
- 670 Views

See, this is what I find offensive
13/05/2010 11:21:28 PM
- 666 Views
Fair enough. It was unfair of me to use "learn."
13/05/2010 11:30:34 PM
- 644 Views
Two posts in three days about a new Government in the country?
13/05/2010 11:18:06 PM
- 677 Views
This is so true
13/05/2010 11:29:30 PM
- 638 Views
Re: This is so true
13/05/2010 11:36:44 PM
- 653 Views
Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:48:26 PM
- 641 Views
Re: Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:54:10 PM
- 631 Views
I certainly wouldn't go that far. Nowhere near. *NM*
13/05/2010 11:43:20 PM
- 325 Views
On the comparison or on you people's spelling?
*NM*
14/05/2010 12:13:42 AM
- 300 Views

They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:50:23 PM
- 623 Views
Re: They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:53:08 PM
- 662 Views
Eh, another time then.
13/05/2010 11:56:21 PM
- 693 Views
I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:43:12 PM
- 762 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:59:28 PM
- 669 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 11:16:07 PM
- 783 Views
I dunno. It looks to me that's what Balwer was saying with his flogged horse comment.
13/05/2010 11:18:30 PM
- 590 Views
I'm sorry you care more about your own political agenda than about trying to see a party in power
13/05/2010 11:44:32 PM
- 592 Views
You think Tories won't go proto-Orwellian on you?
13/05/2010 11:46:45 PM
- 579 Views
If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:54:53 PM
- 674 Views
Re: If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:58:17 PM
- 668 Views
Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:55:17 PM
- 661 Views
Re: Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:59:58 PM
- 759 Views
A date "in a year's time" will be easy to remember. We have Scottish elections on 5 May 2011.
14/05/2010 12:12:26 PM
- 577 Views
People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 11:40:25 AM
- 730 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 01:05:44 PM
- 662 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 01:28:38 PM
- 776 Views