(and this is what has been annoying me about loads of usually intelligent people): it is unfair to judge a modern party based on what the party with the same name did in the past. 13 years mightn't seem like a long time, but it is these days, and the Conservatives are currently lead by a chap who is only 43. Young(er) people tend to be more ... liberal.
Mrs Thatcher was very much her own person - so much so, in fact, that she was ultimately brought down by a party rebellion. There's therefore no reason to suppose that the modern Tories will follow her footsteps. And I've seen that pundits are calling some of the younger chaps Thatcherites: based on what? They've not had any power at all. Comparisons are ridiculous at this point.
I'd be perfectly fine with you being this negative etc if they had given you reason to be recently. They haven't. They've been in Opposition. You actually cannot accurately gauge a party's policies and standards on their Opposition years because their job is to Oppose. That doesn't necessarily show their true colours.
Give it a year and come back to me then.
Mrs Thatcher was very much her own person - so much so, in fact, that she was ultimately brought down by a party rebellion. There's therefore no reason to suppose that the modern Tories will follow her footsteps. And I've seen that pundits are calling some of the younger chaps Thatcherites: based on what? They've not had any power at all. Comparisons are ridiculous at this point.
I'd be perfectly fine with you being this negative etc if they had given you reason to be recently. They haven't. They've been in Opposition. You actually cannot accurately gauge a party's policies and standards on their Opposition years because their job is to Oppose. That doesn't necessarily show their true colours.
Give it a year and come back to me then.
I will. Oh, I will.
' /> Deal.
I will order in a case of wine for the occasion.
Your belief in my tolerance for alcohol may be exaggerated.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
How to live with the Tories
- 13/05/2010 12:33:49 PM
1088 Views
Her 101 reasons to love our Tory government was even better.
- 13/05/2010 12:42:39 PM
749 Views
What an even-handed, stereotype-free, and balanced piece of journalism. *NM*
- 13/05/2010 02:07:35 PM
345 Views
Your partisanship is getting annoying, actually.
- 13/05/2010 06:55:28 PM
812 Views
I'm sorry I care about politics.
- 13/05/2010 08:45:26 PM
755 Views
It's easy to complain. Actually doing something is rather more difficult. *NM*
- 13/05/2010 10:17:47 PM
313 Views
What do you suggest I do, pray tell? *NM*
- 13/05/2010 10:19:30 PM
295 Views
Learn how to live with people who disagree with you.
- 13/05/2010 10:21:08 PM
658 Views
Oh, come on.
- 13/05/2010 10:29:38 PM
775 Views
Do you really spell it "superiour" in Britain? That's wonderful.
- 13/05/2010 10:37:21 PM
806 Views
Pretty please with sugar on top
- 13/05/2010 10:50:48 PM
733 Views
Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
- 13/05/2010 11:02:11 PM
712 Views
Re: Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
- 13/05/2010 11:03:42 PM
669 Views
Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
- 13/05/2010 11:08:48 PM
690 Views
Re: Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
- 13/05/2010 11:11:04 PM
687 Views
I don't mind transference of anger, but let's keep my quotes accurate at least.
- 13/05/2010 11:15:37 PM
698 Views
- 13/05/2010 11:15:37 PM
698 Views
See, this is what I find offensive
- 13/05/2010 11:21:28 PM
693 Views
Fair enough. It was unfair of me to use "learn."
- 13/05/2010 11:30:34 PM
669 Views
Two posts in three days about a new Government in the country?
- 13/05/2010 11:18:06 PM
703 Views
This is so true
- 13/05/2010 11:29:30 PM
671 Views
Re: This is so true
- 13/05/2010 11:36:44 PM
679 Views
Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
- 13/05/2010 11:48:26 PM
669 Views
Re: Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
- 13/05/2010 11:54:10 PM
658 Views
I certainly wouldn't go that far. Nowhere near. *NM*
- 13/05/2010 11:43:20 PM
339 Views
On the comparison or on you people's spelling?
*NM*
- 14/05/2010 12:13:42 AM
312 Views
*NM*
- 14/05/2010 12:13:42 AM
312 Views
They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
- 13/05/2010 11:50:23 PM
649 Views
Re: They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
- 13/05/2010 11:53:08 PM
689 Views
Eh, another time then.
- 13/05/2010 11:56:21 PM
720 Views
I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
- 13/05/2010 10:43:12 PM
788 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
- 13/05/2010 10:59:28 PM
696 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
- 13/05/2010 11:16:07 PM
811 Views
I dunno. It looks to me that's what Balwer was saying with his flogged horse comment.
- 13/05/2010 11:18:30 PM
619 Views
I'm sorry you care more about your own political agenda than about trying to see a party in power
- 13/05/2010 11:44:32 PM
619 Views
You think Tories won't go proto-Orwellian on you?
- 13/05/2010 11:46:45 PM
607 Views
If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
- 13/05/2010 11:54:53 PM
706 Views
Re: If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
- 13/05/2010 11:58:17 PM
697 Views
Thing is,
- 13/05/2010 11:55:17 PM
686 Views
Re: Thing is,
- 13/05/2010 11:59:58 PM
786 Views
A date "in a year's time" will be easy to remember. We have Scottish elections on 5 May 2011.
- 14/05/2010 12:12:26 PM
604 Views
People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
- 14/05/2010 11:40:25 AM
757 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
- 14/05/2010 01:05:44 PM
687 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
- 14/05/2010 01:28:38 PM
804 Views

