Surely a good part of that is just humour, though?
Legolas Send a noteboard - 14/05/2010 12:25:21 AM
Personally it's reminding me of that one Coupling episode which maybe you've seen, with the gay guy who against all expectations sides with the Tory in the political discussion, shocks everybody with "I cried when Portillo lost his seat!" and then points out to the lefties that "You're in power now, you're the Evil Empire!"
Obviously not all of this is joking, and your point that the Conservatives should be given a chance is definitely valid, I don't disagree with you, but I actually thought that Stephen Fry's comments on the election that were posted here as well were more exaggerating and deserving of a wake-up call (at least the part of his comments that was about the prospect of a Tory government, most of the article was about the voting system obviously) than the two humourous articles in this thread.
Obviously not all of this is joking, and your point that the Conservatives should be given a chance is definitely valid, I don't disagree with you, but I actually thought that Stephen Fry's comments on the election that were posted here as well were more exaggerating and deserving of a wake-up call (at least the part of his comments that was about the prospect of a Tory government, most of the article was about the voting system obviously) than the two humourous articles in this thread.
How to live with the Tories
13/05/2010 12:33:49 PM
- 1034 Views
Her 101 reasons to love our Tory government was even better.
13/05/2010 12:42:39 PM
- 695 Views
What an even-handed, stereotype-free, and balanced piece of journalism. *NM*
13/05/2010 02:07:35 PM
- 322 Views
Your partisanship is getting annoying, actually.
13/05/2010 06:55:28 PM
- 771 Views
I'm sorry I care about politics.
13/05/2010 08:45:26 PM
- 708 Views
It's easy to complain. Actually doing something is rather more difficult. *NM*
13/05/2010 10:17:47 PM
- 294 Views
What do you suggest I do, pray tell? *NM*
13/05/2010 10:19:30 PM
- 276 Views
Learn how to live with people who disagree with you.
13/05/2010 10:21:08 PM
- 614 Views
Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:29:38 PM
- 731 Views
Do you really spell it "superiour" in Britain? That's wonderful.
13/05/2010 10:37:21 PM
- 759 Views
Pretty please with sugar on top
13/05/2010 10:50:48 PM
- 687 Views
Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:02:11 PM
- 655 Views
Re: Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:03:42 PM
- 620 Views
Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:08:48 PM
- 642 Views
Re: Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:11:04 PM
- 645 Views
I don't mind transference of anger, but let's keep my quotes accurate at least.
13/05/2010 11:15:37 PM
- 652 Views

See, this is what I find offensive
13/05/2010 11:21:28 PM
- 648 Views
Fair enough. It was unfair of me to use "learn."
13/05/2010 11:30:34 PM
- 625 Views
Two posts in three days about a new Government in the country?
13/05/2010 11:18:06 PM
- 659 Views
This is so true
13/05/2010 11:29:30 PM
- 622 Views
Re: This is so true
13/05/2010 11:36:44 PM
- 635 Views
Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:48:26 PM
- 624 Views
Re: Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:54:10 PM
- 613 Views
I certainly wouldn't go that far. Nowhere near. *NM*
13/05/2010 11:43:20 PM
- 319 Views
On the comparison or on you people's spelling?
*NM*
14/05/2010 12:13:42 AM
- 291 Views

They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:50:23 PM
- 605 Views
Re: They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:53:08 PM
- 643 Views
Eh, another time then.
13/05/2010 11:56:21 PM
- 675 Views
I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:43:12 PM
- 747 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:59:28 PM
- 649 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 11:16:07 PM
- 763 Views
I dunno. It looks to me that's what Balwer was saying with his flogged horse comment.
13/05/2010 11:18:30 PM
- 573 Views
I'm sorry you care more about your own political agenda than about trying to see a party in power
13/05/2010 11:44:32 PM
- 574 Views
You think Tories won't go proto-Orwellian on you?
13/05/2010 11:46:45 PM
- 561 Views
If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:54:53 PM
- 658 Views
Re: If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:58:17 PM
- 652 Views
Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:55:17 PM
- 640 Views
Re: Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:59:58 PM
- 743 Views
A date "in a year's time" will be easy to remember. We have Scottish elections on 5 May 2011.
14/05/2010 12:12:26 PM
- 563 Views
Surely a good part of that is just humour, though?
14/05/2010 12:25:21 AM
- 595 Views
People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 11:40:25 AM
- 711 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 01:05:44 PM
- 644 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 01:28:38 PM
- 757 Views