"These could be used in the future to make the most powerful bioweapons imaginable. The challenge is to eat the fruit without the worm."
why the hell would you want to do that? don't we allready have too many ways to kill other things without adding powerful bioweapons to the list?
is that what scientific discovery is all about now. giving the military 'superpowers' more ways to kill 'the bad guys'?
what a truly stupid and war-hungry world we live in, im surprised the planet isn't redder than mars by now.
It reads to me like he considers the worm to be bioweapons and and the fruit to be things that benefit mankind (in a peaceful way). So he wants us to get the fruit, not the worm.
Though Wibble is right - military research is responsible for a massive number of things we all benefit from today.
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Scientists have created life! God reported to be "miffed"
- 20/05/2010 09:01:10 PM
810 Views
wait... what?
- 20/05/2010 09:40:44 PM
383 Views
Ummm, military technology has always been at the leading edge of research.
- 20/05/2010 09:57:20 PM
418 Views
I think that is what he said
- 20/05/2010 10:00:24 PM
405 Views
I would like to also remind that the military does not only research weapons.
- 20/05/2010 10:42:36 PM
388 Views
Copying one organisms DNA and putting it into another organisms cells is creating life? 
- 21/05/2010 02:43:53 PM
353 Views
- 21/05/2010 02:43:53 PM
353 Views
mmm, I would like to point out they did not merely COPY a creature's dna and put it elsewere
- 21/05/2010 04:23:52 PM
355 Views
But they synthesized existing DNA, right? Or am I missing something?
- 21/05/2010 04:39:23 PM
363 Views
Re: But they synthesized existing DNA, right? Or am I missing something?
- 21/05/2010 05:28:15 PM
383 Views
Huh, where'd you see that?
- 21/05/2010 05:36:39 PM
387 Views
In the original article where it was published, funnily enough
- 22/05/2010 03:18:36 PM
503 Views
- 22/05/2010 03:18:36 PM
503 Views
Didn't realize you could read their articles for free at their site.
- 22/05/2010 03:26:52 PM
333 Views
I do believe...
- 21/05/2010 03:11:58 PM
372 Views