From a pragmatic standpoint and living in a society in which various people from various cultural and religious backgrounds live I believe that many of the -ism you mentioned, along with several others, will help society a lot to allow us to live in peace with one another and are perfectly usefull as guidelines.
Ok, so here you say that pramatical justice allows us to live in peace with one another. Is this not the purpose of justice? What makes your religious justice more valid than pragmatism if they equally allow us to live in peace with one another? What do you believe is the fundamental purpose of justice?
Second, since various religions obviously have different tenants, do you believe that justice for people of different religions is fundamentally different?
Now another fair question, but here reality blurs the philosophical question.
The fact that many people claim to know the law of G/god(s) and that these laws vary in a sence does not mean that there is no God or that God cannot write and/or communicate a law.
The only solution appears to be special pleeding for one religion and that is what I would prefer to be doing, but not only on the basis of the law that goes with it, but also on internal consistency, experiential reality and other criteria which make it plausable.
This special pleeding would imply that one religion is very close to presenting this law and the others have eighter some distortion of this law, or have a human-made law which is being appealed to as if to a divine law.
The answer than is no, except when one is a polytheist and than you have just asked the Eutyphro question which noone can answer.
Do you believe that christianty is the religion about which you speak here?
*MySmiley*
"Men of true genius are like meteors, they consume themselves and illuminate their centuries."
-Napoleon Bonaparte
www.empire-iamhuman.webs.com
"Men of true genius are like meteors, they consume themselves and illuminate their centuries."
-Napoleon Bonaparte
www.empire-iamhuman.webs.com
What is justice?
- 13/06/2010 03:39:12 PM
669 Views
"Justice is the constant and perpetual desire to give everyone his due."
- 13/06/2010 04:08:26 PM
391 Views
Do you think there is something called justice?
- 13/06/2010 10:54:18 PM
463 Views
Well, obviously not with an existence independent of the human mind.
- 13/06/2010 11:07:38 PM
331 Views
Actually, that is being "just" not justice *NM*
- 14/06/2010 05:46:06 AM
135 Views
The original reads, "Iustitia est constans et perpetua voluntas ius suum cuique tribuens".
- 14/06/2010 01:37:10 PM
371 Views
Obviously it's a present active participle. 
- 15/06/2010 12:09:54 AM
329 Views
- 15/06/2010 12:09:54 AM
329 Views
Precisely. As in the well-known Latin phrase iustitio pauperem puerum; nullum corpus me amat.
- 15/06/2010 08:54:59 AM
328 Views
*NM*
To me? "Giving to each what is reasonably owed when it's reasonably possible"
- 13/06/2010 04:22:41 PM
353 Views
An attempt to answer
- 13/06/2010 09:54:03 PM
352 Views
You say that the basis of all justice is the law...
- 13/06/2010 10:51:13 PM
396 Views
Good question
- 13/06/2010 11:05:26 PM
324 Views
I'm an atheist, but stay with me here
- 13/06/2010 11:17:10 PM
435 Views
I'm a christian, but stay with me here
- 13/06/2010 11:40:48 PM
388 Views
That was moderatly obnoxious
- 14/06/2010 12:52:48 AM
449 Views
Great Question
- 14/06/2010 06:16:23 AM
347 Views