Such mistakes are balanced, because each team benefits from them in one game, but is disadvantaged the next time. It's simply part of the game and adds emotional impact.
For example, the second English "goal" yesterday was the revenge for the wrong decision at Wembley.
(but yesterday, Germany would have won anyway)
For example, the second English "goal" yesterday was the revenge for the wrong decision at Wembley.
(but yesterday, Germany would have won anyway)
I think there should be retribution for the atrocious World Cup refereeing
- 28/06/2010 08:09:30 AM
1031 Views
I am still torn on the issue...
- 28/06/2010 09:08:36 AM
685 Views
I really don't think it would ruin the game
- 28/06/2010 09:33:02 AM
813 Views
Perhaps it should be like cricket
- 28/06/2010 10:15:41 AM
830 Views
There are many red + yellow card decisions that are still unclear after checking TV footage, though
- 28/06/2010 10:40:31 AM
753 Views
Should only be done for goals. The game already stops for goals, so it wouldnt ruin the flow *NM*
- 02/07/2010 01:24:29 AM
340 Views
Psychology
- 28/06/2010 09:29:56 AM
707 Views
Indeed. Germany played better overall, but were definitely on the back foot end of the first half. *NM*
- 28/06/2010 09:36:27 AM
327 Views
In the end...
- 28/06/2010 09:33:26 AM
953 Views
Technology? Bah. Platini's experiment would work well.
- 28/06/2010 11:16:54 AM
703 Views
Apparently there's already very good tech that knows whether a ball is over the line.
- 28/06/2010 11:35:50 AM
784 Views
If we are going to engage in the game of "may", then we should be fair . . .
- 28/06/2010 01:47:18 PM
837 Views
The offsides rule should be changed - it should be like hockey.....
- 28/06/2010 07:42:35 PM
631 Views