Active Users:2330 Time:18/06/2026 08:26:41 AM
Re: 1 day, when his team stopped the sprint, cause he fell. Camilla Send a noteboard - 13/07/2010 12:11:02 PM
Who else is thrilled Andy Schleck won?


May that bony idiot burn! Stupid cheater!

He was 3 minutes behind.

But when the same thing happend the next day with Lance they didn't care.

I don't like cheaters.


When Andy Schleck fell, that was not due to any fault of his own. He was caught up in other people's screw-up, and it was on a flat day. It is an unwritten rule of Tour de France that the other overall favourites don't take advantage of things like that. It is one of the main reasons I like the sport. The lack of a sprint didn't have much effect on his position. He is not after the points, he is after the time.

When Lance Armstrong fell, it was (at least the main time) his own fault, and it happened in a completely different stage. People cannot wait in the mountains.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
/Tour de France: Regarding yesterday - 12/07/2010 10:22:45 AM 679 Views
Me! - 12/07/2010 10:26:52 AM 594 Views
Re: Me! - 12/07/2010 05:30:23 PM 591 Views
Re: Me! - 13/07/2010 12:44:01 PM 596 Views
I hate him! - 12/07/2010 11:56:50 AM 626 Views
Cheater? When did he cheat? - 12/07/2010 12:11:37 PM 611 Views
1 day, when his team stopped the sprint, cause he fell. - 12/07/2010 12:14:45 PM 550 Views
Ah. I don't see that as cheating since people could have sprinted if they'd wanted. - 12/07/2010 12:40:35 PM 620 Views
Not really... - 12/07/2010 12:47:25 PM 536 Views
This is woefully uninformed - 12/07/2010 02:38:35 PM 609 Views
I'm not sure that is quite right either - 12/07/2010 02:57:56 PM 623 Views
Not sure I see your point - 15/07/2010 10:10:32 PM 620 Views
I think we do disagree on how the Cancellara slow up worked - 16/07/2010 11:32:52 AM 602 Views
Ahhh we are talking about different falls! - 20/07/2010 02:26:23 PM 595 Views
Re: 1 day, when his team stopped the sprint, cause he fell. - 13/07/2010 12:11:02 PM 606 Views
Re: I hate him! - 12/07/2010 05:30:47 PM 568 Views

Reply to Message