Active Users:386 Time:17/06/2025 06:18:09 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
The amount of newsworthy information in that article was close to zero, though ironclad Send a noteboard - 16/07/2010 10:16:56 AM
It had "Read because we talked to a MURDERER!!" written all over it. I don't even wanna think about how the families of the soldiers must feel.
*MySmiley*

You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
Reply to message
BBC News Sells it's Soul - If it ever had one... Wibble - 15/07/2010 09:50:52 PM 1118 Views
umm ok *NM* Aisha - 15/07/2010 10:03:37 PM 307 Views
wow that's low... *NM* ironclad - 15/07/2010 10:18:28 PM 275 Views
That doesn't... seem that weird? nossy - 15/07/2010 10:40:58 PM 738 Views
Looks like they're trying their best to uphold journalistic integrity in the face of public opinion lord-of-shadow - 15/07/2010 10:54:00 PM 786 Views
In fact, having now read the link a bit better... I think this is good journalism. I applaud it. lord-of-shadow - 15/07/2010 10:57:35 PM 780 Views
thats what i took away form that article Aisha - 15/07/2010 11:13:02 PM 696 Views
I suspect it is the line of thought that says giving terrorists airtime is justifying their actions. *NM* Ghavrel - 15/07/2010 11:32:37 PM 272 Views
That's what I disliked about it, yes *NM* ironclad - 15/07/2010 11:42:53 PM 289 Views
i wonder if the same logic applies to giving air time to white supremacist Aisha - 16/07/2010 02:37:43 AM 637 Views
I don't like that line of thought. Nate - 16/07/2010 02:44:41 AM 810 Views
I was going to say this*: nossy - 16/07/2010 02:47:37 AM 686 Views
The amount of newsworthy information in that article was close to zero, though ironclad - 16/07/2010 10:16:56 AM 650 Views
Perhaps you read a different article then? snoopcester - 16/07/2010 11:19:04 AM 638 Views
I agree snoopcester - 16/07/2010 11:16:25 AM 627 Views
its, not it's. i thought you were talking about the site format, which now sucks. temeraire - 16/07/2010 06:36:23 AM 656 Views
Sorry I just don't see what is upsetting you with this article random thoughts - 16/07/2010 03:12:24 PM 690 Views
You just agreed with snoopcester about something. nossy - 16/07/2010 08:07:15 PM 621 Views
well hell really hasn't frozen over yet random thoughts - 16/07/2010 11:14:31 PM 800 Views
I'd rather have an unbiased source of information BlackAdder - 17/07/2010 12:19:39 AM 719 Views
Ditto snoopcester - 17/07/2010 12:28:39 AM 617 Views
that is funny coming from the guy who reads the Guardian random thoughts - 17/07/2010 03:12:05 PM 577 Views
I'd guess I actually spend more time reading the Daily Telegraph snoopcester - 17/07/2010 04:15:43 PM 587 Views
Whoa nossy - 17/07/2010 08:59:35 PM 752 Views
Not at me, surely. I'm adorable. *NM* Ghavrel - 17/07/2010 10:07:15 PM 289 Views
Pft, evil most often hides behind "adorable." *NM* nossy - 17/07/2010 10:34:22 PM 254 Views
you wouldn't know an unbiased source if it bit you random thoughts - 17/07/2010 03:09:46 PM 610 Views
"loony left"? BlackAdder - 17/07/2010 11:40:41 PM 655 Views
Sorry man. everynametaken - 16/07/2010 11:54:38 PM 596 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes