Active Users:425 Time:28/03/2026 06:12:33 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Not at me, surely. I'm adorable. *NM* Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 17/07/2010 10:07:15 PM
If you two start fighting because I said something I thought was funny, I'm going to go off. Seriously. At everyone.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
BBC News Sells it's Soul - If it ever had one... Wibble - 15/07/2010 09:50:52 PM 1218 Views
umm ok *NM* Aisha - 15/07/2010 10:03:37 PM 334 Views
wow that's low... *NM* ironclad - 15/07/2010 10:18:28 PM 302 Views
That doesn't... seem that weird? nossy - 15/07/2010 10:40:58 PM 815 Views
Looks like they're trying their best to uphold journalistic integrity in the face of public opinion lord-of-shadow - 15/07/2010 10:54:00 PM 875 Views
In fact, having now read the link a bit better... I think this is good journalism. I applaud it. lord-of-shadow - 15/07/2010 10:57:35 PM 856 Views
thats what i took away form that article Aisha - 15/07/2010 11:13:02 PM 764 Views
I suspect it is the line of thought that says giving terrorists airtime is justifying their actions. *NM* Ghavrel - 15/07/2010 11:32:37 PM 303 Views
That's what I disliked about it, yes *NM* ironclad - 15/07/2010 11:42:53 PM 321 Views
i wonder if the same logic applies to giving air time to white supremacist Aisha - 16/07/2010 02:37:43 AM 698 Views
I don't like that line of thought. Nate - 16/07/2010 02:44:41 AM 885 Views
I was going to say this*: nossy - 16/07/2010 02:47:37 AM 757 Views
The amount of newsworthy information in that article was close to zero, though ironclad - 16/07/2010 10:16:56 AM 725 Views
Perhaps you read a different article then? snoopcester - 16/07/2010 11:19:04 AM 720 Views
I agree snoopcester - 16/07/2010 11:16:25 AM 704 Views
its, not it's. i thought you were talking about the site format, which now sucks. temeraire - 16/07/2010 06:36:23 AM 733 Views
Sorry I just don't see what is upsetting you with this article random thoughts - 16/07/2010 03:12:24 PM 753 Views
You just agreed with snoopcester about something. nossy - 16/07/2010 08:07:15 PM 697 Views
well hell really hasn't frozen over yet random thoughts - 16/07/2010 11:14:31 PM 871 Views
I'd rather have an unbiased source of information BlackAdder - 17/07/2010 12:19:39 AM 791 Views
Ditto snoopcester - 17/07/2010 12:28:39 AM 684 Views
that is funny coming from the guy who reads the Guardian random thoughts - 17/07/2010 03:12:05 PM 644 Views
I'd guess I actually spend more time reading the Daily Telegraph snoopcester - 17/07/2010 04:15:43 PM 685 Views
Whoa nossy - 17/07/2010 08:59:35 PM 840 Views
Not at me, surely. I'm adorable. *NM* Ghavrel - 17/07/2010 10:07:15 PM 321 Views
Pft, evil most often hides behind "adorable." *NM* nossy - 17/07/2010 10:34:22 PM 284 Views
you wouldn't know an unbiased source if it bit you random thoughts - 17/07/2010 03:09:46 PM 686 Views
"loony left"? BlackAdder - 17/07/2010 11:40:41 PM 728 Views
Sorry man. everynametaken - 16/07/2010 11:54:38 PM 665 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes