You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
Jacob Send a noteboard - 13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
nanny-state ftw!!!
If you do stupid things, take pictures of them (another stupid thing), post them on a public social network page (another stupid thing), you have then established a pattern of behavior that employers can take into account. If you've got several qualified applicants, and these days all jobs do, that public information is just another piece of information... especially if that job has any public/social aspect to it.
HR looks at facebook.
- 13/09/2010 07:07:35 PM
1049 Views
my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
- 13/09/2010 07:53:03 PM
786 Views
Re: my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
- 13/09/2010 10:17:41 PM
698 Views
Was it supposed to be a HIPAA violation or something?
- 14/09/2010 10:41:44 PM
689 Views
I would say it was because she was letting unauthorized people handle babies under intensive care.
- 14/09/2010 10:55:45 PM
629 Views
I wish they would've fired my coworker.
- 14/09/2010 10:54:48 PM
620 Views
Public is public is public.
- 13/09/2010 08:28:19 PM
644 Views
no one should have to be accountable for their stupidity!!!
- 13/09/2010 09:07:01 PM
695 Views
You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
- 13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
615 Views
Who? *NM*
- 13/09/2010 08:53:00 PM
326 Views
Human resources. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 09:04:14 PM
296 Views
Thanks. Why not write that, April? *NM*
- 13/09/2010 10:34:02 PM
337 Views
Because HR is a very widely used abbreviation in the English-speaking world.
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
334 Views
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
334 Views
It's really a word in itself by now. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:29:04 PM
287 Views
Hmpf *NM*
- 14/09/2010 08:15:33 AM
340 Views
What does that stand for? Something with ridiculously too many letters and in German, no doubt. *NM*
- 15/09/2010 12:43:40 AM
301 Views
Hot Redheads. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 10:23:12 PM
308 Views
Eh, no biggie.
- 14/09/2010 02:16:37 AM
593 Views
Where it might be justified would be if the employee had just called into work
- 14/09/2010 02:55:00 AM
618 Views
That's the stupidity clause.
- 14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
595 Views
- 14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
595 Views
maybe it should or it shouldn't...but it does
- 14/09/2010 04:26:50 AM
615 Views
lol, I guess we have different ideas of "simply living."
- 14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
549 Views
- 14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
549 Views
I'd say in that specific case...
- 14/09/2010 06:11:48 AM
610 Views
Huh, it's all the rage here
- 14/09/2010 02:01:11 PM
677 Views
I don't think HR should be looking at what people do outside of work, it seems unethical
- 14/09/2010 10:42:37 AM
562 Views
They shouldn't, but I would expect them to.
- 14/09/2010 02:08:07 PM
622 Views
I agree.
- 14/09/2010 10:46:12 PM
583 Views
