You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
Jacob Send a noteboard - 13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
nanny-state ftw!!!
If you do stupid things, take pictures of them (another stupid thing), post them on a public social network page (another stupid thing), you have then established a pattern of behavior that employers can take into account. If you've got several qualified applicants, and these days all jobs do, that public information is just another piece of information... especially if that job has any public/social aspect to it.
HR looks at facebook.
- 13/09/2010 07:07:35 PM
1087 Views
my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
- 13/09/2010 07:53:03 PM
825 Views
Re: my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
- 13/09/2010 10:17:41 PM
743 Views
Was it supposed to be a HIPAA violation or something?
- 14/09/2010 10:41:44 PM
729 Views
I would say it was because she was letting unauthorized people handle babies under intensive care.
- 14/09/2010 10:55:45 PM
665 Views
I wish they would've fired my coworker.
- 14/09/2010 10:54:48 PM
659 Views
Public is public is public.
- 13/09/2010 08:28:19 PM
677 Views
no one should have to be accountable for their stupidity!!!
- 13/09/2010 09:07:01 PM
735 Views
You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
- 13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
653 Views
Who? *NM*
- 13/09/2010 08:53:00 PM
343 Views
Human resources. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 09:04:14 PM
310 Views
Thanks. Why not write that, April? *NM*
- 13/09/2010 10:34:02 PM
352 Views
Because HR is a very widely used abbreviation in the English-speaking world.
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
350 Views
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
350 Views
It's really a word in itself by now. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:29:04 PM
309 Views
Hmpf *NM*
- 14/09/2010 08:15:33 AM
360 Views
What does that stand for? Something with ridiculously too many letters and in German, no doubt. *NM*
- 15/09/2010 12:43:40 AM
315 Views
Hot Redheads. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 10:23:12 PM
324 Views
Eh, no biggie.
- 14/09/2010 02:16:37 AM
636 Views
Where it might be justified would be if the employee had just called into work
- 14/09/2010 02:55:00 AM
658 Views
That's the stupidity clause.
- 14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
631 Views
- 14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
631 Views
maybe it should or it shouldn't...but it does
- 14/09/2010 04:26:50 AM
659 Views
lol, I guess we have different ideas of "simply living."
- 14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
587 Views
- 14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
587 Views
I'd say in that specific case...
- 14/09/2010 06:11:48 AM
652 Views
Huh, it's all the rage here
- 14/09/2010 02:01:11 PM
712 Views
I don't think HR should be looking at what people do outside of work, it seems unethical
- 14/09/2010 10:42:37 AM
596 Views
They shouldn't, but I would expect them to.
- 14/09/2010 02:08:07 PM
658 Views
I agree.
- 14/09/2010 10:46:12 PM
622 Views
