You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
Jacob Send a noteboard - 13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
nanny-state ftw!!!
If you do stupid things, take pictures of them (another stupid thing), post them on a public social network page (another stupid thing), you have then established a pattern of behavior that employers can take into account. If you've got several qualified applicants, and these days all jobs do, that public information is just another piece of information... especially if that job has any public/social aspect to it.
HR looks at facebook.
- 13/09/2010 07:07:35 PM
1067 Views
my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
- 13/09/2010 07:53:03 PM
804 Views
Re: my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
- 13/09/2010 10:17:41 PM
720 Views
Was it supposed to be a HIPAA violation or something?
- 14/09/2010 10:41:44 PM
708 Views
I would say it was because she was letting unauthorized people handle babies under intensive care.
- 14/09/2010 10:55:45 PM
645 Views
I wish they would've fired my coworker.
- 14/09/2010 10:54:48 PM
637 Views
Public is public is public.
- 13/09/2010 08:28:19 PM
663 Views
no one should have to be accountable for their stupidity!!!
- 13/09/2010 09:07:01 PM
712 Views
You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
- 13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
634 Views
Who? *NM*
- 13/09/2010 08:53:00 PM
333 Views
Human resources. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 09:04:14 PM
302 Views
Thanks. Why not write that, April? *NM*
- 13/09/2010 10:34:02 PM
344 Views
Because HR is a very widely used abbreviation in the English-speaking world.
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
341 Views
*NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
341 Views
It's really a word in itself by now. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 11:29:04 PM
296 Views
Hmpf *NM*
- 14/09/2010 08:15:33 AM
347 Views
What does that stand for? Something with ridiculously too many letters and in German, no doubt. *NM*
- 15/09/2010 12:43:40 AM
307 Views
Hot Redheads. *NM*
- 13/09/2010 10:23:12 PM
315 Views
Eh, no biggie.
- 14/09/2010 02:16:37 AM
613 Views
Where it might be justified would be if the employee had just called into work
- 14/09/2010 02:55:00 AM
634 Views
That's the stupidity clause.
- 14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
612 Views
- 14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
612 Views
maybe it should or it shouldn't...but it does
- 14/09/2010 04:26:50 AM
638 Views
lol, I guess we have different ideas of "simply living."
- 14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
568 Views
- 14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
568 Views
I'd say in that specific case...
- 14/09/2010 06:11:48 AM
628 Views
Huh, it's all the rage here
- 14/09/2010 02:01:11 PM
694 Views
I don't think HR should be looking at what people do outside of work, it seems unethical
- 14/09/2010 10:42:37 AM
578 Views
They shouldn't, but I would expect them to.
- 14/09/2010 02:08:07 PM
638 Views
I agree.
- 14/09/2010 10:46:12 PM
601 Views
