Active Users:377 Time:01/05/2025 08:24:42 AM
Wow...that reminds me of Homer Simpson looking for that "sweet, sweet can". Tom Send a noteboard - 29/09/2010 08:31:35 PM
They might as well just have a fake reporter asking, "Have you ceased raping children?" and then splice in a clip of the candidate saying, "No, and I never will."

While his faith may be on the conservative side, he's talking about picking Bible verses to use when praying for your family members that DON'T emphasize those ideas, but rather, the idea of one's personal responsibility to others. While it says something about the nature of the Bible, I'm not sure his comments are even remotely in context in that attack ad.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Scuzziest politcal ad of the season... so far - 29/09/2010 08:06:19 PM 1147 Views
Wow...that reminds me of Homer Simpson looking for that "sweet, sweet can". - 29/09/2010 08:31:35 PM 817 Views
You think that's worse than Renee Elmer's one in North Carolina? - 29/09/2010 08:38:30 PM 1137 Views
you may not like her position but it isn't a blatant lie - 29/09/2010 08:47:44 PM 801 Views
Yes, much - 29/09/2010 08:55:38 PM 787 Views
The ad didn't make me cringe, but the interview afterward certainly did - 29/09/2010 09:07:06 PM 769 Views
Yeah... oh dear, this is painful. - 29/09/2010 09:37:26 PM 755 Views
I'm with the other people responding. - 29/09/2010 09:18:50 PM 817 Views
The bad news he will lose in November - 29/09/2010 08:42:22 PM 735 Views
His name is Daniel Webster. That is awesome *NM* - 29/09/2010 09:02:15 PM 365 Views
To be fair... - 29/09/2010 11:59:33 PM 851 Views
What little I found in the time I had... - 30/09/2010 04:02:51 AM 865 Views
Why should a woman get alimony for cheating on her husband? - 30/09/2010 05:23:03 AM 760 Views
Because the law in question only eliminated it for women. - 30/09/2010 05:27:12 AM 1024 Views
What law? - 30/09/2010 07:49:59 PM 848 Views
Shedding a little light on the "Law" in question. - 01/10/2010 12:40:00 AM 893 Views
You can argue almost any position but that doesn’t make it right - 30/09/2010 08:17:03 PM 878 Views
Poor life choices? - 30/09/2010 09:46:14 PM 839 Views
I did say in rare case they deserve limited alimony - 30/09/2010 10:47:39 PM 870 Views
I'm not saying that alimony should be very high, of course. - 30/09/2010 11:27:08 PM 770 Views
This is why I hate politics. *NM* - 30/09/2010 12:11:08 AM 359 Views
Pathetic. *NM* - 30/09/2010 12:25:52 AM 368 Views
I like how he disabled comments for the video. Pussy. *NM* - 30/09/2010 06:40:57 AM 369 Views

Reply to Message