Didn't Daniel Webster vote for the things they scrolled across the bottom of the screen? From what I've read in the press, he did vote to end abortion for victims of rape, to prevent alimony in cases when the female spouse was unfaithful but not the male, and a few more that I can't recall off the top of my head.
His support for those positions came, he said, from his religious views.
His support for those positions came, he said, from his religious views.
Some true, some not?
Enough of it is false to expose Grayson as slime.
Scuzziest politcal ad of the season... so far
- 29/09/2010 08:06:19 PM
1170 Views
Wow...that reminds me of Homer Simpson looking for that "sweet, sweet can".
- 29/09/2010 08:31:35 PM
830 Views
You think that's worse than Renee Elmer's one in North Carolina?
- 29/09/2010 08:38:30 PM
1161 Views
The ad didn't make me cringe, but the interview afterward certainly did
- 29/09/2010 09:07:06 PM
786 Views
I despise them both. In their own way they are both disgusting, manipulative, ignorant tools.
- 30/09/2010 03:46:36 AM
699 Views
*NM*
To be fair...
- 29/09/2010 11:59:33 PM
871 Views
What little I found in the time I had...
- 30/09/2010 04:02:51 AM
880 Views
Why should a woman get alimony for cheating on her husband?
- 30/09/2010 05:23:03 AM
778 Views
Because the law in question only eliminated it for women.
- 30/09/2010 05:27:12 AM
1116 Views
You can argue almost any position but that doesn’t make it right
- 30/09/2010 08:17:03 PM
893 Views
Poor life choices?
- 30/09/2010 09:46:14 PM
850 Views