Active Users:244 Time:09/05/2024 10:36:30 PM
Well said BlackAdder Send a noteboard - 30/09/2010 08:54:38 PM
I've no clue what Nirmohi Akhara is...

*googles* here is what I found in another article:

Nirmohi Akhara

One third of the site will go to the Nirmohi Akhara, a group of Hindu ascetics who are devotees of none other than Lord Ram. Their name means, roughly, “Group Without Attachment.” They have given up the material world for the company of their god. They are “sadhus” – or Hindu holy men often characterized by the hermetic tendencies. They claimed in court that there is no mosque called Babri Masjid at the site in Ayodhya, nor did the Mughal commander Babur make any conquest or any occupation of territory in India. They also claimed the site is of ancient antiquity and has existed before the living memory of man.


So basically they're insane. Well, that's that then.


No one wants to put up with them at the extended family gatherings.

I do find it shocking that they can deny that Babur and the Mughals conquered India. It seems that there are so many attempts to whitewash Indian history, from so many viewpoints, that it's almost funny to watch (well for me anyway). It's almost commonplace now :D
Reply to message
/Religion: Ayodhya verdict: Disputed land to be divided - 30/09/2010 05:53:03 PM 410 Views
It's a busy time for India. - 30/09/2010 06:04:19 PM 218 Views
Re: It just might. - 30/09/2010 06:14:51 PM 249 Views
Re: It just might. - 30/09/2010 06:18:39 PM 217 Views
Well. Compromise is good? - 30/09/2010 06:09:02 PM 219 Views
Re: Yes it is. Fingers crossed! *NM* - 30/09/2010 06:15:10 PM 104 Views
Hmm, OK - 30/09/2010 08:23:10 PM 241 Views
Re: I think that's why they get an extra fraction instead of lumping it with "other" Hindus. - 30/09/2010 08:41:15 PM 256 Views
Well said - 30/09/2010 08:54:38 PM 202 Views
Re: Everyone paints over their histories, I think. - 30/09/2010 09:07:26 PM 344 Views
I don't know about that... - 30/09/2010 09:25:05 PM 218 Views

Reply to Message