Active Users:471 Time:18/09/2025 11:44:05 AM
Why work together on things we all want when you can have a public brawl? Joel Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 10:30:31 PM
My opinion on this is split. While it forces the Senate to finally deal with the issue, it looks like the GOP throwing a temper tantrum by doing so in this way. Like Tom, I'm afraid that several universally-agreed-upon items (for all parties concerned) could wind up under the bus on this.

Tell me again how Democratic partisanship alienated the concilatory Republicans after the '08 election....
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
GOP to shut-down lame duck session in Senate - - 01/12/2010 07:47:12 PM 539 Views
It makes sense from their perspective. - 01/12/2010 07:51:03 PM 427 Views
As a devoted fiscal conservative..... - 01/12/2010 08:05:46 PM 407 Views
I am emphatically for a new tax bracket. *NM* - 01/12/2010 09:21:23 PM 165 Views
Re: It makes sense from their perspective. - 01/12/2010 09:24:34 PM 470 Views
That seems reasonable; must be why you're not in Congress. - 01/12/2010 10:25:24 PM 504 Views
The decision on those tax cuts should have been taken a while ago, agreed. - 01/12/2010 08:13:55 PM 417 Views
Legolas = sore loser - 01/12/2010 08:27:51 PM 433 Views
Loser? Come again? I'm not an American, dude, it's not my country we're talking about. - 01/12/2010 10:14:54 PM 435 Views
Still an amazingly whiny post.....just saying. *NM* - 01/12/2010 11:41:31 PM 173 Views
*NM* - 02/12/2010 12:46:56 AM 155 Views
My feelings exactly. *NM* - 02/12/2010 07:01:58 PM 160 Views
Re: GOP to shut-down lame duck session in Senate - - 01/12/2010 09:17:53 PM 378 Views
Why work together on things we all want when you can have a public brawl? - 01/12/2010 10:30:31 PM 380 Views
This would be more impressive... - 01/12/2010 10:03:55 PM 362 Views
Re: GOP to shut-down government. - 01/12/2010 11:01:58 PM 377 Views

Reply to Message