Active Users:990 Time:31/01/2026 06:41:25 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
And it doesn't forbid content-neutral bans on funeral protests. Everyone wins. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 03/03/2011 08:53:20 AM
That said, the sooner these people stop appearing everywhere, the better.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

This message last edited by Ghavrel on 03/03/2011 at 08:53:41 AM
Reply to message
US Supreme Court allows anti-gay funeral protests everynametaken - 03/03/2011 04:55:52 AM 990 Views
Honestly... good. *NM* beetnemesis - 03/03/2011 04:59:21 AM 261 Views
Yeah ... Darth_Katie - 03/03/2011 03:23:54 PM 611 Views
And it doesn't forbid content-neutral bans on funeral protests. Everyone wins. Ghavrel - 03/03/2011 08:53:20 AM 643 Views
Here's the problem Bad Ash - 03/03/2011 05:05:15 PM 690 Views
About time you came back, Shannon! Tashmere - 03/03/2011 11:42:39 PM 569 Views
Whoah, talk about jumping into the wayback machine! Avendesora - 04/03/2011 02:19:36 AM 633 Views
Fascinating that Alito should be the one to dissent. Legolas - 03/03/2011 10:35:05 PM 616 Views
I believe in siding with free speech but this one is hard random thoughts - 03/03/2011 10:58:04 PM 589 Views
No freaking kidding!!!! Exactly how I feel. Tashmere - 03/03/2011 11:38:54 PM 607 Views
Yes! *NM* @my - 04/03/2011 04:27:02 AM 254 Views
What a terrible ruling. The cliche is correct: interesting cases make for bad law. Tom - 04/03/2011 04:44:25 AM 592 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes