Active Users:669 Time:31/10/2026 03:06:06 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
And it doesn't forbid content-neutral bans on funeral protests. Everyone wins. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 03/03/2011 08:53:20 AM
That said, the sooner these people stop appearing everywhere, the better.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

This message last edited by Ghavrel on 03/03/2011 at 08:53:41 AM
Reply to message
US Supreme Court allows anti-gay funeral protests everynametaken - 03/03/2011 04:55:52 AM 1091 Views
Honestly... good. *NM* beetnemesis - 03/03/2011 04:59:21 AM 306 Views
Yeah ... Darth_Katie - 03/03/2011 03:23:54 PM 707 Views
And it doesn't forbid content-neutral bans on funeral protests. Everyone wins. Ghavrel - 03/03/2011 08:53:20 AM 739 Views
Here's the problem Bad Ash - 03/03/2011 05:05:15 PM 790 Views
About time you came back, Shannon! Tashmere - 03/03/2011 11:42:39 PM 665 Views
Whoah, talk about jumping into the wayback machine! Avendesora - 04/03/2011 02:19:36 AM 740 Views
Fascinating that Alito should be the one to dissent. Legolas - 03/03/2011 10:35:05 PM 712 Views
I believe in siding with free speech but this one is hard random thoughts - 03/03/2011 10:58:04 PM 679 Views
No freaking kidding!!!! Exactly how I feel. Tashmere - 03/03/2011 11:38:54 PM 710 Views
Yes! *NM* @my - 04/03/2011 04:27:02 AM 298 Views
What a terrible ruling. The cliche is correct: interesting cases make for bad law. Tom - 04/03/2011 04:44:25 AM 693 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes