Active Users:1682 Time:26/08/2025 02:26:07 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
how is surveillance not a type of search? *NM* moondog Send a noteboard - 17/05/2011 09:25:27 PM
The fourth amendment gives you the right to not be searched or have your property searched or taken without proper legal justification. Being followed either electronically or in person does neither of those things. There is no difference in the knowledge they would gain between following physically or electronically so there should be no difference it in your expectation of privacy.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
secret GPS tracking upheld as legal practice moondog - 16/05/2011 02:37:14 PM 916 Views
How do they expect honest criminals to make a living with rules like this? random thoughts - 16/05/2011 06:24:45 PM 532 Views
sure this example is about convicted robbers Aisha - 16/05/2011 06:42:51 PM 492 Views
I will have a problem when I see innocent people being targeted for no reason random thoughts - 16/05/2011 09:17:22 PM 491 Views
so get a warrant if these guys are such threats to society moondog - 17/05/2011 12:57:51 AM 485 Views
once again privacy takes place in private not in public. That is sorta where the word comes from random thoughts - 17/05/2011 02:23:05 PM 496 Views
checks and balances moondog - 17/05/2011 09:22:13 PM 533 Views
no the police can follow you around without probable cause random thoughts - 17/05/2011 10:09:57 PM 490 Views
the constitution guarantees the right of privacy to all, not just law abiding citizens moondog - 16/05/2011 09:14:24 PM 492 Views
where does it say that? It should be real easy to point to since it is in the constiution random thoughts - 16/05/2011 09:21:19 PM 544 Views
4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 12:55:00 AM 533 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:13:13 AM 494 Views
Re: 4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 03:28:36 AM 520 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:58:49 AM 490 Views
Re: 4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 09:19:09 PM 495 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 21/05/2011 05:47:43 AM 472 Views
try reading it again it doesn't have the word privacy in it random thoughts - 17/05/2011 02:42:44 PM 506 Views
how is surveillance not a type of search? *NM* moondog - 17/05/2011 09:25:27 PM 250 Views
Because it's surveillance when they're in public. Sareitha Sedai - 17/05/2011 09:31:02 PM 534 Views
The kiddies still call it weed. *NM* Ghavrel - 18/05/2011 12:08:26 AM 217 Views
your example does not quite work for this situation moondog - 18/05/2011 01:49:02 AM 513 Views
how is different if it is done by GPS or tailing them in a car? *NM* random thoughts - 17/05/2011 10:00:53 PM 202 Views
it's not different -- if they get a warrant first moondog - 18/05/2011 01:50:13 AM 501 Views
OK I will use smaller words random thoughts - 18/05/2011 02:23:05 PM 527 Views
spelling it out for you moondog - 18/05/2011 04:18:45 PM 588 Views
I'm happy with it. *NM* callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:04:42 AM 334 Views
Molestation Knightscape - 18/05/2011 04:22:19 AM 704 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes