Active Users:594 Time:16/09/2026 11:22:52 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
how is surveillance not a type of search? *NM* moondog Send a noteboard - 17/05/2011 09:25:27 PM
The fourth amendment gives you the right to not be searched or have your property searched or taken without proper legal justification. Being followed either electronically or in person does neither of those things. There is no difference in the knowledge they would gain between following physically or electronically so there should be no difference it in your expectation of privacy.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
secret GPS tracking upheld as legal practice moondog - 16/05/2011 02:37:14 PM 1070 Views
How do they expect honest criminals to make a living with rules like this? random thoughts - 16/05/2011 06:24:45 PM 648 Views
sure this example is about convicted robbers Aisha - 16/05/2011 06:42:51 PM 608 Views
I will have a problem when I see innocent people being targeted for no reason random thoughts - 16/05/2011 09:17:22 PM 623 Views
so get a warrant if these guys are such threats to society moondog - 17/05/2011 12:57:51 AM 604 Views
once again privacy takes place in private not in public. That is sorta where the word comes from random thoughts - 17/05/2011 02:23:05 PM 618 Views
checks and balances moondog - 17/05/2011 09:22:13 PM 652 Views
no the police can follow you around without probable cause random thoughts - 17/05/2011 10:09:57 PM 601 Views
the constitution guarantees the right of privacy to all, not just law abiding citizens moondog - 16/05/2011 09:14:24 PM 609 Views
where does it say that? It should be real easy to point to since it is in the constiution random thoughts - 16/05/2011 09:21:19 PM 663 Views
4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 12:55:00 AM 654 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:13:13 AM 607 Views
Re: 4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 03:28:36 AM 636 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:58:49 AM 612 Views
Re: 4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 09:19:09 PM 615 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 21/05/2011 05:47:43 AM 585 Views
try reading it again it doesn't have the word privacy in it random thoughts - 17/05/2011 02:42:44 PM 621 Views
how is surveillance not a type of search? *NM* moondog - 17/05/2011 09:25:27 PM 297 Views
Because it's surveillance when they're in public. Sareitha Sedai - 17/05/2011 09:31:02 PM 647 Views
The kiddies still call it weed. *NM* Ghavrel - 18/05/2011 12:08:26 AM 263 Views
your example does not quite work for this situation moondog - 18/05/2011 01:49:02 AM 625 Views
how is different if it is done by GPS or tailing them in a car? *NM* random thoughts - 17/05/2011 10:00:53 PM 253 Views
it's not different -- if they get a warrant first moondog - 18/05/2011 01:50:13 AM 614 Views
OK I will use smaller words random thoughts - 18/05/2011 02:23:05 PM 646 Views
spelling it out for you moondog - 18/05/2011 04:18:45 PM 713 Views
I'm happy with it. *NM* callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:04:42 AM 393 Views
Molestation Knightscape - 18/05/2011 04:22:19 AM 834 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes